do you know what a primary source is? also i browse the cbr site every now and then and most of the time its,
-source is export restricted/classified
-player not providing what gaijin ask for (front page and contents and the info)
-or only providing 1 secondary source
I disagree in general, but even if they do change its at most like a few times a year, and most of the ‘changes’ are just people misinterpreting what the requirements are in the first place and then misconstruing that to other people
im just coping, and hoping that gaijin does actually have some internal consistency and are just really opaque about it tbh (which to be fair, isnt always untrue)
i dont know about dozens, multiple times maybe, but idk if there even have been enough cases where “marketing lies” could be the reason for denial for that to have happened dozens of times
gaijin, again, already has pre-determined narratives and metas they want to secure. They want the J-15 to arrive in this state for a reason. They could have easily gave it these pods, they know about these pods already, they just didn’t.
i wouldnt say that for sure tbh, gaijin arent perfect and we already know that their sources in china can be flawed (from the last guy that was actively getting chinese vehicles nerfed while in that positions)
in the post the guy says they can deploy chaff, plus we already have external cm pods that can deploy countermeasures and irl also do ECM but just dont in wt
and sure its just a guy but its also something of hope for the j15t
yes i could tell it doesnt have the canards of the j15t, im not an idiot mate, i was more in general referring to the same post as the guy above me there
Cuh, give it up guys, literally there is no point, to bug report anything you need to provide doc’s that either dont exist or are classified, so literally everything is up to gajin, cause you can go of feasability as much as you want in the end it is still a guess and not accepted as are calculations. This goes for all modern chn planes btw (they could add the J-20 with a mig 21 radar and you couldnt bug report it as there are no reliable sources)
did, now i have a degree in radar science, the differences that would show in warthunder between the two seem not that consequential, aesa just overall a bit better, especially at scanning and like i said,
In PESA radar, a single central transmitting source passively distributes signals to hundreds/thousands of antenna elements via the phase shifter.
Although the PESA radar is capable of forming a beam that can perform electronic scanning, it does not generate multiple beams because it has a single transmitting source. When it scans multiple targets, it alternates its beam between these targets.
In the AESA system, there is no central transmission unit; each antenna element or group of antenna elements has a transmission and reception unit.
Each T/R unit performs the electronic scan, and it is capable of generating multiple beams.
The only thing PESA does better is its range; PESA radars have an absurd range.
In War Thunder, they not only work the same, but the PESA also has more range.
In other words, in the WT, the PESA and AESA radar have the same scanning and situational awareness capabilities, while maintaining the range of the PESA.
giving an advantage to the PESA system.
The trade-off only exists for AESA. (In game).
Another problem is fixed radars and hybrid scan radars.
Fixed radar systems like those on the Rafale and the F-15C GE have a disadvantage in field of view, but should have an advantage in frontal RCS.
In theory, if a hybrid radar aircraft and a fixed radar aircraft were to face each other in a BVR and head-on scenario, the fixed radar aircraft would spot the hybrid radar aircraft first.
In the game, there is no such trade-off; hybrid scanning PESA radars are superpowers and have the best of both worlds.
I didn’t want to get into that subject because that’s a story for another topic.
