1 Like
Not all of them
WS-10C is only used on J-20A rn - there is not a single picture of a J-10 with WS-10C as far as I am aware.
Pakistani J-10CEs are equipped with WS-10B for sure;
6 Likes
i meaaaany it didnt stop sm2 from getting the engine
3 Likes
J-10B all 2 of them
J-10S not sure how many got it
J-10C
1 Like
Which are planned and were tested on it (even if in half configuration)
some news said, service version delivered last month
I really like how they deliberately pick the worst engine and then pretend it’s not a problem that they created when asked to fix it
9 Likes
it will be fine if the drag is fixed, but you know
Has anyone else had a problem on dev server when the radar locks onto a target and can’t be removed in TWS mode. I’ve had it a number of times where even if I manually switch targets, turn off radar, reset the scan to centre the lock will always return to the initial target, until he is out of the scan limit.
Also just saying is it remotely possible for gaijin to add a wider scan pattern, like 120/140 * 5 cause currently 70 degrees does suck a bit. IDK about other ESA radars though.
An issue about radar elevation angle.
The incorrect radar elevation angle of the J-10C // Gaijin.net // Issues
3 Likes
4 Likes
Should the J-10C be renamed to J-10C early since it uses the Saturn still?
8 Likes
I can’t with gaijing, a 200km range, slow scan and not really wide angles, plus the stupid engine that is in 20/200 j-10C
No, everyone who has been waiting for the C to arrive for so long don’t deserve that. Besides, apparently they are still making changes to the WS-10B engine model in the dev files, so we could get a last minute engine swap.
5 Likes
Submitting issue reports is almost useless—they almost always get rejected within ten minutes. Now, I feel the hope of seeing the WS-10B in the game is slim.
21 Likes
Is the WS-10B that better compared to the installed engine we have RN ?
How much thrust would we gain ?
AL-41F/177S level, 14500KGF, and possibly better high altitude performance
take the example of current game
3 Likes
The WS-10B boasts a maximum thrust of 14.5 tons, which is 1.5 tons greater than the current in-game AL-31FN3 and 600 kg higher than the in-game single-engine AL-41FS. The WS-10B is essential for the J-10C, given its currently abnormally slow acceleration at high altitudes in the game, especially at its Battle Rating (BR) of 14.3. This is because the AL-31FN3 in the development server has undergone two rounds of nerfs. If the J-10C continues to use the AL-31FN3, its maneuverability improvement over the J-10A would be minimal .
According to the simulation chart, when comparing the J-10C in a clean configuration with the J-10A, the J-10C’s energy characteristics are not significantly superior to the J-10A’s within the altitude band of 9,000 meters to 5,000 meters. Furthermore, when the J-10C is loaded with two additional PL-12 missiles, its drag and weight increase further.
Moreover, compared to other fighters at the 14.3 BR (except for the F/A-18E), its acceleration performance is relatively poor, and the time it takes to reach its top speed is quite slow.
6 Likes
The F/A-18E is also a poor insect in 14.3, it can hardly compete with others. However, the F/A-18E is not the focus of discussion in this thread.