Chengdu J-10, History, Performance & Discussion

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/e9gTIpUADREo

400 view, 342 signatory and still no modo to answer me… T-T

Ping a mod

mod confirmed gaijin’s source of adjusting J-10’s performance, but with clear mistake. the max speed here is structure damage speed not max speed.
and from datamine, the drag factors was increased by 11%

2 Likes

bros, my friends and I are working on a issue about J-10’s resistance in high speed, which is preliminarily proved(it takes J-10 about 3 times the time to get from Mach1.0 - 1.1 compared to F16)
But we meet some problem in material source as we are not experts in these.
Now, we need material about:

  1. pubilished books/papers about aerodynamic design , explaining that any part of these design(mid-range coupled canard wing+delta wing+supersonic rectangular inlet), have low supersonic zero up resistance
  2. Introduction of J-10, directly explaining its configuration it’s low resistance in supersonic.

Material‘s language is not problem, we’ve collected some, but not enough convincing. And thanks for any future help.

@crunchyBoy @MiG_23M @Miraz05 @pegabug @141_allen @阿依土鳖的罗初

5 Likes



QQ20240905-144101

2 Likes

2

4 Likes

My compatriots have also published a large amount of evidence and issues in different partitions, most of which have been rejected by TrickZZter for various reasons. You can view a wealth of evidence by examining the posts in each section
@NCC105

5 Likes

Name of the book?

P1/P2《兵器知识》Issue 4 2007
P3《青苹果》Issue 7, 2007

2 Likes

I have not reviewed any materials, have you considered that the F-16 may have better power to weight in this region of flight? At what altitude?

1 Like

600m, and it behaves very strangely, it’s like the drag increased suddenly after supersonic.

Gaijin officials cited interviews that were not originally qualified as evidence in the issue area, and as evidence, they “increased the overall air resistance of J10 by 11%” (unpacking message)

1 Like

Yeah so I flew her last night, and it was alright up to mach 1. However, anything past mach 1 felt extremely slow in terms of acceleration like the engine suddenly lost half it’s thrust the moment the sound barrier broke. Kind of felt like an F11F-1 trying to push past 1.01 lol! I’m certain it’s a bug because that just… Didn’t feel good, nor make any sense, with the rate of acceleration just dropping right at 1.00 mach.

1 Like

Gaijin increased its drag and reduced the top speed yesterday.

3 Likes

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/e9gTIpUADREo
I harass them, I pity them but now the report is sent for J10 😅 🎊🎉🎊🎉

4 Likes

Yippee

pl5EII

3 Likes

Community Bug Reporting System “J10A”

Community Bug Reporting System “JF-17”
for those he wants to play the JF-17 I made a report so that he can fire the C-701 which will make him more effective. the same report for the J10A has gone to acknowledged, the report for the JF-17 will have more chance to be validated by all, I ask you all for great support!!

2 Likes

Thanks a lot for the information.

2 Likes

How much range does the PL-5EII have in game? (in actual match)