The usual suspects defending CAS just don’t get it.
They are so enamoured by the need to constantly be in the air that it clouds their vision. They just cannot imagine a world where tank players dont suffer as much.
As they say. One must imagine Sysiphus(Tankers) happy.
Better option: If y’all take up such an issue with planes having low impact, move the airfields closer.
Mim-72 outturns planes. Only option is to flare (it’s at 9.0 so most planes can’t) or to stay out of range, or in other words, be afk and make no contribution to the match.
Oh also, you said using Walleyes is braindead, but all SPAA has to do is move a few meters. The walleye won’t track unless it’s extremely close.
Meh not really. Having to pay extra for a vehicle that gets less kills does not sound great.
I’m talking ant ppl who want it moved back at low tier as well.
Stingers can lock and fire far outside Walleye lock range. All the SPAA needs to do is move a few meters.
I specified Gepard 1A2 for a reason.
Spawning 3 SPAA back to back with no kills is spam.
False
Nah, it’s pretty bad.
Honestly, it’s pretty funny seeing CAS haters try to stay shame others, then have massive crashouts when someone else shows their significantly worse stats.
That’s not absurd at all. Tanks reach the battlefield in just a minute or often times less.
Actually, it’s the opposite. CAS is the legitimate counter.
You’re an america main. It won’t affect you.
If my P-51C at rank 2 and 3.7 can maintain 586 km/h TAS for about 32 km without issue, then you have zero excuses to complain about runway distance. Just use your MEC and keep some minimal diving room.
If you played japan then maybe you’d get an excuse since those planes have like no speed even while undamaged. When full of holes, they can struggle to hit 450 in a dive without losing it the moment you level out.
It’s a bad change, regardless of the fact that I play mostly Russia and Germany (in ground at least).
Its a good change and lowers the frequency of CAS Mains.
I love how it ended with saying:
„ Play stupid games, win stupid prizes”
Not to mention that many people suggested such a thing in order to balance the air.
A skilled Jumbo player can deal with opponents like the Tiger and Panther with ease. Though penetrating opponents can be difficult at first, it is still a tank worthy to pick up.
Not really. It’s a pretty bad change by itself.
Good or bad change is a matter of personal preference rn. Wait ubtill it’s implemented and we will see the effect it has.
We have a pretty good guess on the effects it’ll have, and without a similar nerf to SPAA, it’s simply a bad change.
What you say???The first spawn will still cost the same as it does now
Your title is distorting the facts. The fact is that first CAS can play a crucial role.
Your title look like Gaijin delete your plane;
In fact, you can still strike twice, but one of them is to attack the enemy aircraft.
CAS is not the all of a fighter. I hope so-called “CAS players” can recognize this fact.
The problem is that second CAS spawn is increased price whilst SPAA receives no similar nerf.
Yes and those effects are beneficial to ground players since CAS cannot just jump into another cheap CAS plane just because they are not the same class.
So you would suggest implementing increasing SP costs for secondary SPAA spawn or what?
good CAS player doesnt need second CAS plane spawn.
That was never a problem to begin with.
Yes. All radar and SAM SPAA should cost 150sp, and spawning an SPAA should increase the cost of spawning another SPAA.
This means you’re limited to 2 SPAA spawns unless you’re actually good at the game, just like planes.
A good player doesn’t need a second spawn in any vehicle 🐢
Either way, going by your logic, there’s no reason to increase CAS second spawn price.
increasing SP cost of SECOND CAS plane wont affect a good CAS player, simple as.
Yes it was.
Not 100% sure but is that not already the case? If you wanna bring out a backup SPAA it already costs more SP
Then there’s no reason to do it.
Iirc SPAA has same cost regardless of how many you spawn. Either way, 70sp (or 90 for some) is far too low for a vehicle that has the advantage over 600 or even 900 SP vehicles.
