Then you get into a tank like the rest of the playerbase and fight on the ground or you establish your dominance in the sky by preventing the enemy team from bringing in a CAS plane.
2 Likes
I appreciate those who doing CAP but why are you talking about playerbase?So we don’t like the new changes and we became “CAS main”?
Seriously I do both CAP and CAS and I spent more time on the ground instead of in the air,and still I don’t like this change.
3 Likes
I for one love this change. Keeps the skies clear for longer.
3 Likes
As the Gripen has FnF and GBU39s. It was my go to CAS. Though I don’t play top tier anymore
1 Like
How about low and mid-tier GRB like USSR4.7. You can now spawn another yak9k with default belt after the first 9k crashed without doubling SP. This game doesn’t only involve top-tier matches
4 Likes
It’s become better balanced. This is a good thing. For 80% of nations, they did not have a powerful multirole CAS aircraft classed as a strike aircraft. This have those 2 nations a massive and overwhelming advantage
3 Likes
I hope they set up exception for that and class that gun as a ground attack weapon. Likewise for things like the mosquito with the anti tank gun
2 Likes
If you think that the new change can balance US and USSR,I’m fine with that.However the "80% of nations"will receive their multirole eventually.
3 Likes
They might, they might not.
THere is no guarantee that something like the Gripen D would
A) be added to the game
or
B) be classed as a strike aircraft.
Sweden is going to perticuarly benefit from this change because the highest BR Strike aircraft they have at the moment is an 11.0.
They can now spawn in the Gripen A or C and respawn in the other with just pure CAP. This basically makes the Gripen A worthy to bring to a top tier line up.
Its a huge buff for CAP and balances CAS
3 Likes
I think this could already be covered. Ground belts do increase SP cost on any higher caliber plane.
1 Like
It might, but would still be good to get clarrification on that fact.
I dont think ammo belts were mentioned in the blog.
2 Likes
Are you sure this is balance? Then why not change the joint land and air operation to a purely land-based one.
2 Likes
They were not mentioned and yes clarification is needed. I just don’t recall if they said A2G ordnance or armamanets. Anyway they have the system to make them more expensive and thus class them for this new system.
1 Like
Last time I checked, all the objectives were on the ground already. So it already.
But War Thunder has always had the ability to use multiple branches within a single gamemode and is marketed that way. So TO wont be added
1 Like
Since they have already taken this as a selling point, why do you still want to weaken it? This mechanism is simply forcing the players to engage in a land-based confrontation.
1 Like
i think this change is alright - although i do also think that it should be possible to change loadouts on the airfield like in ARB
currently j-ing out at the airfield requires you to pay the increases SP cost
also perhaps this change should only affect aircraft with a2g munitions, so you could second spawn with a2a loadout on a fighter for example
5 Likes
Yeah, I agree with both points.
2 Likes
I thoroughly enjoy CAS in GRB but this is a good change. You should not be able to jump in an Su-30SM (a fighter) with a full loadout of KH-38s, get a stupid amount of easy kills from a very OP missile, and jump into say an Su-33 (a bomber) with more Kh-38s and not see an increase in SP cost. This is a really good change.
7 Likes
Did you know Air Arcade, Air Realistic and Air Simulator battles exist where you can spawn your aircraft first-thing and only use the aircraft?
Shocker, I know!
Prepestrous, call the constables!
1 Like
Less planes = Less willingness to spawn SPAA = More Slaughter on careless ground guys.
Also affects balancing of nations at ww2 brs
Also barely any plane is played at 8.0-11.0 already
Also CAP sp is not lowered.
When they say ARB is not the gamemode for the attackers and bombers lol
Edited, 2 more questions:
What about the Attackers who don’t have a place in ARB, and would be replaced by a fighter in GRB?
What about the 100kg/ rbs82 small loads of fighters? Less fun moment?
4 Likes