Omfg I hate the changes already. Its not at all as they said that low calibers do less damage than high calibers. They are lit more effective. Tried shooting B-29 with Me 163. Did 4 dive attacks at it wasting all its shells until one bomber went down.
Then tried to shoot bomber with Ryusei B7A2 the B-17 I was shooting ate 200 20mm shells - absolutely nothing happend to it. Meanwhile one incenary 12 mm hit my ryusei wing - started fire and in 2 sec my wing was offf wtf.
Then Me 262 narwal with 50 mm shells with nearly half a kg of TNT and sent like 10 of those in lincoln and B 29 and did absolutely nothing
Then tried playing bombers - so i also have plot armor
Feels more like bomber nerf in his case. my wing lit burned off in less than 2 sec from single 12 mm hit. I dont remember that being the case. And few years ago Ryusei were completly stable even without wing. Now they just insta die without wing.
While bombers i was hitting were burning for 10 min while the planes were burning fireballs. And putting the fire out frequently
P-61’s have been LONG overdue a damage model adjustment.
Currently(in AB mode) it takes 3x - 4x, even 5x more time/effort
and shots to kill a P-47 than it does to splatter any P-61.
It just doesn’t make any sense. I am sure there are many more examples
similar to this, but this has been a glaring “misadventure” for many years now.
P-61s should a “survivability” somewhere between the P-47 & A-26
p.s. and it should not even be called a fighter, the P-61’s need & deserve
attacker designations.