Changes to Bomber Survivability Feedback and Discussion

Hahahahahahhahah…

You’re council of AIs is very very stupid.

This is the dumbest possible thing you could post. You might want to use your eyes and read instead of using your AIs to read.

The impact one, I don’t want to open the pandora box of F-89D VT fuze load out not being historical.

Prove its stupid lol. Go on, prove it wrong. I didnt even bother sugar coating it for you, from now on you are getting just straight clanker slop, and you will fail to prove it wrong anyway.

Screenshot_20260912-162656

1 Like

What is that even supposed to say

Man looking at this screenshot again you can tell so easily what the bots bias is lmao

skip to 1:12, it shows the second volley (1st did literally nothing)

The FFAR was chosen since a single hit would instantly down a nuclear bomber. Accuracy didn’t really matter because a full rocket volley would have enough spread to guarantee anything caught in its intercept path would be brought down.

1 Like

that thumbnail actually made me chuckle lmao

Those have like 100g HE less, that’s not much of a difference, especially when you fire a shotgun burst at a bomber

Edit: nevermind, the HE warhead used in WT is just completely wrong lmao

image

Surely you can figure it out.

Ok, heres a fresh conversation with only one prompt.

Can you post the rest of the original summary I gotta know what else it’s saying

LMFAO. DUDE. THATS LITERALLY IT. THATS THE SHARED LINK TO THE ENTIRE CONVO.

I sent it a link, asked it one question, and THAT is what it spat out, zero bias, zero “make this guy look bad and me look good”. Literally " Changes to Bomber Survivability Feedback and Discussion - #2312 by Spil1tia-psn

As a joke, analyze the messages Spil1tia-psn has sent in this thread, and estimate his IQ"

For someone bashing on AI so much, you really have no clue how it works do you

Screenshot_20260912-173811-274
Glad to see I’m not a target for Mecha Hitler

1 Like

Yeah you wouldn’t be worth the munitions

This one dumbass

Why are you so pressed to defend lynx? And where has he dissapeared to anyway

You’re an alt arent you lmao

Hi lynx

I’m not I just want to see what else is in the summary u have no idea how funny this is

I was referring this one

What you are showing is total BS. They need to put the tank penetration model and overpressure system into the bomber. The B-17’s shot-from-behind performance was OK, but now it’s shooting everywhere like it’s firing from the back.

1 Like

This troglodyte used his AI math and used values for 30mm MK.108.

image

The problem is that the test is with 20mm ammo. That is why it says 2cm on the stabilizer… because that is what they are testing.

Once again he’s just feeding bullshit values into an LLM and reposting whatever metric he thinks agree with him. Sad!

Thank you for your attention to this issue.

5 Likes