Those have like 100g HE less, that’s not much of a difference, especially when you fire a shotgun burst at a bomber
Edit: nevermind, the HE warhead used in WT is just completely wrong lmao
Those have like 100g HE less, that’s not much of a difference, especially when you fire a shotgun burst at a bomber
Edit: nevermind, the HE warhead used in WT is just completely wrong lmao

Surely you can figure it out.
Ok, heres a fresh conversation with only one prompt.
Can you post the rest of the original summary I gotta know what else it’s saying
LMFAO. DUDE. THATS LITERALLY IT. THATS THE SHARED LINK TO THE ENTIRE CONVO.
I sent it a link, asked it one question, and THAT is what it spat out, zero bias, zero “make this guy look bad and me look good”. Literally " Changes to Bomber Survivability Feedback and Discussion - #2312 by Spil1tia-psn
As a joke, analyze the messages Spil1tia-psn has sent in this thread, and estimate his IQ"
For someone bashing on AI so much, you really have no clue how it works do you

Glad to see I’m not a target for Mecha Hitler
Yeah you wouldn’t be worth the munitions
This one dumbass
Why are you so pressed to defend lynx? And where has he dissapeared to anyway
You’re an alt arent you lmao
Hi lynx
I’m not I just want to see what else is in the summary u have no idea how funny this is
I was referring this one
What you are showing is total BS. They need to put the tank penetration model and overpressure system into the bomber. The B-17’s shot-from-behind performance was OK, but now it’s shooting everywhere like it’s firing from the back.
This troglodyte used his AI math and used values for 30mm MK.108.

The problem is that the test is with 20mm ammo. That is why it says 2cm on the stabilizer… because that is what they are testing.
Once again he’s just feeding bullshit values into an LLM and reposting whatever metric he thinks agree with him. Sad!
Thank you for your attention to this issue.
They probably can’t implement overpressure on planes and, to be honest, even if they could, it would likely lead massive problems
The penetration model wouldn’t fix the issue of HE rockets not dealing enough damage
Mr President is that you???
for everyone that cannot read german:

This clip still makes me wonder if there is something wierd going on with prox fuses, and not necessarily something to do with the damage/damage model, because the explosions looked all over the place, including quite far away from the bomber
I have no idea what the prox fuse radius is and I cant see it in the weapons spreadsheet
(actually a small part of my wonders if they are chain reacting? the first few explode on prox, and the rest are being taken out by the expoding rockets)

you said the he111 has 2mm skin, i calculated for 0.6-0.8, and you also claimed this little hole is a 20mm, So whats this big hole
your numbers are constantly changing aswell as your stories
Now find the film
That image is the exact same one he just showed. They are all 20 mm mineshells.
Here, on the top left:

Yes. I am the President of the Toxic Fighter Main council. Bomber dads are sad losers who can’t even formulate their own arguments without input from a machine. Imagine taking all the cumulative knowledge of humanity and shoving it through an algorithm in being SUCH A FRAGILE snowflake that you have to MAKE IT AGREE with you!
Sad sad low energy losers.
The FFAR proxy fuse has a large trigger radius now. But it’s less about the damage and more that 4 engine fires + 1 miraculous fuel fire just go out and it can just keep flying just fine
It’s like 13m now