There aren’t, obviously. You’ve been lied to.
We have SINGLE DIGIT NUMBER queue times in WT routinely for the bulk of the game. This is not an excuse.
Nobody, repeat: Read this: Nobody cares about “variety” if “variety” entails them facing vehicles they have zero chance to defeat because gaijin thinks you should face a T58 in a Maus
Huh? it has about the same armor in the back of the turret like in the front. and its a flat plate. You can angle the back of the turret as well.
Everyones stats are public through the player names shown in the forum…
If the maus’ armor is mid. Then what would you label every other tanks armor? Maus mid armor, every other tank bad armor?
It performs pretty well on 7.7
You can’t even pen the direct rear of the turret when its unangled in lots of tanks at the SAME BR as the Maus
1 Like
Hold on a second. I literally said:
and that i would have loved to have a test of a 0.7 br range. Im in favor of that.
That still doesnt eradicate possible downsides that there might or might not be. (i dont see those, but others apparently see some)
Bruh even if the Maus is balanced at 7.0(it’s not) what are the 6.0s going to do to it? It has more side armor than an M18 using APCR could pen
Yes I read it. Presenting these “theories” as valid gives gaijin ammunition to keep the game compressed using these as excuses when in reality everybody is aware these excuses are baseless
Okay fair enough, it’s not “mid” armor but it’s not immortal, and far from it. I base my rating not off of pen values, but how much I actually die and how easily I get penned resulting in a high mid-low good rating. It gets penned A LOT even in a downtier.
Yes, a flat plate that makes it all the easier to go through. You also realize it has like 3 degree/second traverse right? It makes it nearly impossible to angle enough to someone behind you if you’re reacting, and if you’re behind one and it’s already angled, then just move a little.
Where did i do that? Did i fall through a wormhole and missed 30 minutes?
Didn’t mean to. Meant to reply to iwillrickrollyou
That is basically the only “downside” one could find, which, for me personally wouldnt matter at all. Average queue time is less than 30 sec, idc if it was 45 seconds or a minute for more equal matches. But i am aware that for the snail queue times are apparently the holy grail.
Maybe my labeling of that as a “downside” is a bit wrong, bc i wouldnt label it as that its the obvious result if the matches get more fair and u cant see the tanks facing each other like in your example.
It would create NEGLIGIBLE differences in queue time and match variety but HEAVILY reduce frustration.
1 Like
My opinion exactly.
Variety imo also shouldnt be a concern, bc since decompression started lots of tanks were added for basically every nation at almost all brs so theres more variety at most brs already.
And easier to angle. Its still 200 mm btw
We’ve never had decompression
3 Likes
Okay I already had this entire discussion with another guy just scroll up a ways, it ends around comment 180
I think its a neverending process that is currently ongoing at a snails pace so in the short human lifespan it might be hard to see.
Thats at least what the rumours tell me.
No. It just has never happened in the games history. You can’t say you’re going on a diet because you ate one less chicken nugget in your 40 piece meal
But…thats exactly what most people do? :-D
I mean…the max BR is going up like…0.3 per year? xD