Challenger2turret basket

[Sfundz]

Yeah, the mod will review your report issues like
[DEV] NOMADS missing IRIS-T Missiles

[Sfundz]

make the report issues about that chally turret basket with sources then we will vote

[Brufffh]

and send the link here!! I’ll support

[鸟白岛最好骗的女人空门苍]

The Challenger 2 doesn’t have a turret basket at all. // Gaijin.net // Issues

[VYTS-352]

VT-5：First time？

[IHаteCAS]

They already did unfortunately.

[Brufffh]

Hellooo! I’ve made a very thorough essay regarding this issues on gaijinnet issues, please help support by upvoting!

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/4grVv1H4nIqZ

[Kirisuuu]

No matter for parity or consistency, adding something that was never there in real life is just a complete joke. Why add something that actively nerfs a nation that was never in the spotlight with complete false information?

[Panther2995]

They already did.

Check Mk3-4’s.

[Circleati]

@Kirisuuu

with complete false information?

so youre saying that the challenger 2’s floor doesnt rotate as the turret does?, because that is all that gaijin is claiming

the question of whether damage to that floor should stop turret traverse is something else entirely, but gaijin has made up their minds on that ig

[ole_54]

It’s on the mk 1 and 2 as well.

[Morvran]

The main issue I have with this change is that it has come with no other bug fixes of note. Especially adding the missing spall liners. It is rare to survive a hit anywhere that can pen, and if you did, you were probably very disabled. Now its just gotten worse. But there were no other fixes, no other buffs. Out of the entire list of things they could have chosen to fix on the Challenger 2. They picked the only thing that I am aware off that would actually nerf it. Like come on, Gaijin. Really?

[Exocetta]

Chally turret floor looking at the 12 o’clock position but pointed at the 5 o’clock position on the hull;

That rotating platform or anything from the turret attached to it gets damaged and the whole thing is going to not be able to traverse.

[ForeverAloneRage]

^This
Its annoying how people do no research and instantly submit a false bug report

Page 47 Service Inquiry report into the Challenger 2 incident at Castlemartin Ranges, Pembrokeshire on 14 June 2017 - GOV.UK

[Necronomica]

The visual model and the damage model aren’t always the same, is the bottom part also part of the damage model?

@Smin1080p_WT

The turret baskets in the X-ray and in the Damage Model are different. Their DM is smaller than their X-ray representation, as X-ray baskets have fine details, like mesh and some purely structural struts which are not present in the actual Damage Model.

@Smin1080p_WT

The damage model is not technically shown in-game, however it’s still possible to see. If you hover over the smaller components within the basket, they’ll not highlight the horizontal drive, meaning they’re just aesthetic and not part of the damage model.

[阿依土鳖的罗初]

VT5： first time?

[Morvran]

I think so

[BabySoEz]

@鸟白岛最好骗的女人空门苍

Please support us. They’re constantly pushing the community’s limits. If they can nerf an already weak British vehicle like this, there’s nothing they won’t do. If we accept it this time, they’ll just keep making changes to other vehicles that players care about.

Pfff, what are they gonna do? turn a card board into a PPF film ? /s

[Sfundz]

add the sources

[Circleati]

@Necronomica

The visual model and the damage model aren’t always the same, is the bottom part also part of the damage model?

I feel this is the biggest problem with the turret drives, like the abrams looks especially bad but its just the top, bottom, a battery on the bottom, and the hydraulic system, but the visual model is just so ambiguous