he’s got a point. Meanwhile ABRAMS doesn’t have the DU armor, F-16C pod still whit gen1 thermals and overall bad implementation of NATO stuff well. is still a game but is funny when all the soviet/russian stuff is so well modeled.
Abrams has DU armor [whether it’s the correct amount of protection or not is up for debate but it’s DU armor], F-16C pod is reported and acknowledged, and NATO stuff is implemented rather well on average.
There are just as many inaccuracies in Soviet equipment.
RD-33 consumes more fuel than it should. It consumes .85 TSFC when it should be .77 TSFC as an example.
So no, your post is incorrect.
Don’t look at just the inaccuracies on one side, look at all the inaccuracies, ask questions, never assume.
1 Like
@Ladies_Man_217
Not sure why you’re using a name that’s not me.
Dude, I can list correct NATO stuff with ease:
Strv 122, all M60s, M1 Abrams, IPM1, M1A1, AH-64, Leopard 2A6, Strf 9040s, Gripen, Mirage 2000, Mirage 4000, Mirage F1C, AMX-40, AMX-32, OF-40, AV-8B [literally perfect on introduction], F-4F, 2PL, F-14A & B… to name a few.
Yeah, some stuff has issues, irrelevant of tech tree.
BTW Russia isn’t a tech tree in War Thunder.
Su-27 bleeds too much speed, and Mig-29s consume too much fuel.
The only correct top aircraft for Soviets is Yak-141, which is ironic since it was a prototype.
1 Like
the Yak-141 ingame is crazy since it was a prototype and it was never equiped with a radar and still there it is
have u seen the PUMA,Challenger,Abrams missing stuff and modeled innacurately, it’s absurd how gaijin take their time with russian stuff and model them correctly while Puma gotta suffer since it’s missing spall liners, and whole load of stuff, and abrams fuel tanks not modeled correctly.
Yes, I see vehicles in all tech trees missing stuff.
They take their time with “Russian” stuff? lol That’s why Mig-29 consumes more fuel than it should and F-16 was fixed within a major update of its initial release.
Su-27 having more drag than it should causing more speed bleed…
There’s a reason Su-27 isn’t the best jet in game. Lack of countermeasures and flight performance.
Abrams fuel tanks should explode like everyone else?
Dude, you need to stop listening to Russian propaganda and look at the facts like I and others do.
No one talks about Soviet aircraft seriously.
No one talks about the T-90M despite it being 2A7V armor equivalent with worse ammo.
All people talk about are the Gripen, 2A7V, and Strv 122s because those are actually the top dogs right now.
Soviets were top dogs when flares weren’t in the game and that’s it.
Ehrm, MiG-27
🤓
Britain says hi
1 Like
Harriers, Chieftain, and Challenger 1 are examples that come to mind quickly.
Chieften missing laser range finder and I’m sure a few other bugs as well
Challenger 1, lots of open big reports, even this thread missing it’s historically accurate shell that would also be a massive buff
Harrier… Sea harrier missing loads, Placeholder cockpit HUD, missing radar gunsight, wrong RWR.
Gr7… Missing MAWS, missing loadout options, gen 1 Tpod, despite gen 2 and 3 available
3 Likes
Which one? Cause Mk3 doesn’t have one IRL, I know that. Partially the reason for the ranging machine gun.
Mk5 I forgot if I researched it or not.
As for GR7… all of those are optional additions except MAWS which I think they’re still coding for more aircraft.
AV-8B+ = Gen 2
Most 11.3+ CAS = Gen 2
Harrier Gr7 = Gen 1
Kinda unfair. Just give it TIALD 500
(Though I think they may have found that TIALD 400 was actually gen 2)
I’d rather the GR9 get added so we finally have the best Pegasus.
That being either Gr9A or Gr7A (the A denote the engine upgrade)
Gr7 should have stayed at 11.3 with 9Ls. It’s now forced to 11.7 so needs some buffs. Or it’s ground BR to go down to 11.3 in June
1 Like
They have
1 Like
Has been reported for a while now. Just like all things with SPRITE it should be Gen 2
1 Like
So that’s, Chally 1 and TIALD. Anything else meant to be Gen 2?
1 Like
Vic Mk7 and Cr2. One of them is already Gen 2
2 Likes
There are probably other i dont know about
Was thinking maybe Warrior? Or Striker? Seems like the kind of thing that might have SPRITE
I did some research and warrior is Catherine MP, just like in game.
Striker is still a mystery to me.
1 Like