Challenger 2 needs to be brought to developers attention

Those are words never before spoken

5 Likes

Wait does that mean that the side era of the TES has the same performance and Romor?

Yeah, always has been the case expect dev server, when tes had 1200ce protection

A buff
Finally something

Another example of double standards… The ERA is most likely shield R from Rafael

Nah, the era is the ASPRO-HMT

Oh hell that thread is even more of a dumbster fire than the bug report I jus tread… “Public data is not enough to prove that is hat that level of protection”… YOU CAN GUESS WHERE THEY HAVE THEIR MAGIC VALUES for Russian ERA

2 Likes

Do any of these TES buffs apply to the OES?

What TES buffs?

Increased protection on the ERA Bricks

What increased protection it’s the same

They are the same. No matter where i look it is still 30 400

must be getting my wires crossed

There was no change to era at all. The plate behind it got nerfed from 110 to 40

Why

Check the data and discussion topic, it is there. But for short, pixel measures from Gaijin side

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/JNzssHFCBEas
side armour report

That report is not about it. It is about the giant block that is close to the ground, and the nera blocks on 2f

my bad, is the one at the bottom

1 Like

image
Here is the photo. However that is a Dorchester 2G configuration. The bottom block stayed the same in the 2h/i, but the back plate did not, and we tried to prove it

3 Likes