Challenger 2 needs to be brought to developers attention

[warhead_beast]

DM 63 apperantly doesn’t have a huge increase in pen

From the 2A7V thread

[Mytho-GR1]

But less likely to go boom when hit

[SuTa_basuto]

@Smin1080p

Suggestion reports can be made for new ammo. That’s absolutely fine. This report however was claiming the current loadout was incorrect (which it isn’t as it’s a balance choice) and had only one invalid source.

Providing the report is properly a suggestion and has valid sources, it’s entirely fine to make suggestions.

you can make a report on it

[As_H3]

But it has an increase, therefore would buff the capabilities. We’re getting CR3 (P) live in it’s current state, years of playing Britain has convinced me of this

[SwingfireOP]

No doubt. It’s going to be released a buggy mess like the other challengers and it will stay that way.

At this point, I’d be surprised if they even give it a spall liner.

If the challengers and chieftains don’t have their spall liners when everyone else gets them, I am going to be exceedingly pissed off.

This upcoming update is turning out to be a bit of a crossing of the rubicon for gaijin. But of a disaster this one lads.

[warhead_beast]

@SwingfireOP

At this point, I’d be surprised if they even give it a spall liner

You mean the sound proofing

[As_H3]

Yeah that’s not happening, they said in their post that other tanks are going to have to wait till the next major and that’s ‘if’ we can find a credible source that survives the gaijin moderators

[Godvana]

Lmao, this comment on the Rus forums

Some friendly people on the Rus forums :))

@RemPG

At which plant will they produce it and for what cones? The Vickers tank factory was demolished long ago, and at the Aston Martin or Jaguar Land Rover plant, it will clearly not be particularly convenient to make another ingenious British 100-ton tanker. So proud British guys will buy a Leopard 2A7 by kissing their British pride in the seat. Or maybe they will even run like psheki to the Koreans, for K2 Black Ponter. For the objection of a great Britain from sea to sea exists only in the wet fantasies of Boris Johnson, and this hour it is an out-of-state country of the 3rd world.

Единая тема обсуждения наземной техники Великобритании

[thepoopsmith1]

no it wont, they will just rename dm54 to dm63. its not like the wet storage of the challengers are modelled

[warhead_beast]

It’s not the wet ammo storage that makes DM 63 less likely to explode but the propellant used

[thepoopsmith1]

was a great read, thanks!

[Almighty_Sigmar]

What psheki means?

[warhead_beast]

Probably Poland since they are the only ones going with the K2 in Europe

[Tim_TeaDrinker]

Its russian very offensive name of the Poland

[Almighty_Sigmar]

Yeah I was pretty sure that its about my Poland. I’ve never heard it before

[Tim_TeaDrinker]

Russians are very fond of insults. We call the British chayehlebs (teadrinkers), so I chose this nickname and wrote it in English.

[thepoopsmith1]

i was talking about the standard challengers i know about the propellent in the german rounds

[Mytho-GR1]

@Tim_TeaDrinker

We call the British chayehlebs (teadrinkers)

Now thats funny

[SwingfireOP]

Never thought I’d be spending my Saturday morning trying to find the exact specifications of the spall liner in chieftain tanks.

It’s like trying to prove water is wet. We all know it had it, we all know it’s made of kevlar but finding the exact specs isn’t easy so far.

My theory, is that at the very least if we get it added to the chieftain then it makes no logical sense for the challengers not to have it, so they should get it by default.

I live in hope.

[Tim_TeaDrinker]

Spoiler

Watch this video from 0:33 with an auto-translator.
It’s very funny, that he said))))
https://youtu.be/Ut2cetzfWE8?si=RtKbG4ICrk_FN4GC