Challenger 2 turret in production
Spoiler
2 Likes
Is that the bubblegum gaijin think the turret is made of? 🤣
11 Likes
Don’t give Gaijin any ideas, they might nerf the Challenger because of these photos.
Looks a bit undersized based on the top measurement.
Edit: my bad, misread the value as 530. I guess that means the model is pretty accurate dimension wise, (maybe very slightly undersized still).
The person who posted the image above claimed the L94 sits with a 150mm offset from mantlet rear (unsure without a decent picture of turret interior), and protrudes 100mm from mantlet front (which can be seen). This would give a LOS thickness of ~700mm which matches this photo here which claims to be measured from mantlet rear through the L94 hole:
3 Likes
Only math i see is here is the likelihood of gaijin implementing this mantlet model = 0%
8 Likes
you right.
They don’t have to implement anything. All of the armour plates are there, but somehow the mantlet is still ~250mm.
7 Likes
Bit like 250mm of nera = 30mm of ke protection lol
2 Likes
NERA, yea seems resonable
Composite with NERA elements, for sure not.
2 Likes
Do you think this means we can now get our kettle?
7 Likes
We can bug report it till we do
2 Likes
I was planning on a really really detailed bug report for it for the 1st of April and then got slammed. So never did it in the end
3 Likes
Kettle hit along with ammo … leaking water stopped fire (hit) XD
6 Likes
Guys, I have a question - what is it on the lower frontal part on the Challenger 2 and Challenger 3 series tanks. I searched the Internet and did not find any information, can you tell me what it is?
1 Like
I think it’s a mounting point for the blade earth moving attachment (BEMA). Maybe some cable is connected there.
5 Likes
Thanks)
it’s a plug, it goes all the way through the tank, might be for cables when needed.
2 Likes
https://twitter.com/i/status/1781010615609299000
New short video on the Challenger 3 posted by Grant Shapps a few minutes ago
4 Likes