You noticed how Russian tanks also do not pop their turrets as much especially the high tier ones. they explode but the turret doesn’t fly into the air.
Ooh careful while the community managers do not give a crap they the censors are out.
You noticed how Russian tanks also do not pop their turrets as much especially the high tier ones. they explode but the turret doesn’t fly into the air.
Ooh careful while the community managers do not give a crap they the censors are out.
Idk if DX stands for something but the docs we have say CHARM 3 would use Rowanite 307
And whats the point in all this if the HESH shell itself isnt stored in armoured bins and is just scattered around the hull of the tank, so regardless of charge bins, the HESH shell itself will detonate.
HESH is stored in armoured bins.
I’ve had multiple comments of mine removed talking about the Russian tanks missing their turret baskets specially when comparing them to other vehicles, stating that Russia are given preferential treatment. Abrams, Leopard, Leclerc, Type 10, and even the Challenger 2’s got turret baskets, historically or ahistorically, and yet Russia still don’t have theirs.

eg.1

eg.2
Yes its a model, but AFAIK it’s accurate. It shows that the autoloader and turret basket can be and are seperate.
But for the sake of staying on topic, lest this gets flagged ASWELL. - Why does challenger 2 get an ahistorical turret basket, yet this isn’t added yet?
Not sure thats true is it?
I like the way the model shows the turret in it’s usual configuration. Can you also depict one factory-fresh before it yeets it’s top?
(/S)
I have been looking, the best representation i can find of it is this;


The ammunition/autoloader sits around it, and the basket itself sits in the centre of the carousel.

^ Without Basket

^ With Basket
Definitely looks like a turret basket to me no matter what sort of mental gymnastics Gaijin want to use.
Will they fix it? …Crickets
the first two images with diagrams of those parts are from a document which translated to English showed a certain pipeline (if you know, you know.)
I believe the document was to do with cooling systems inside the vehicle. It just happens that they showed that the vehicle has a turret basket in doing so; which also means that its incredibly likely if not certain the T-72, T-80 and T-90 all have them. Basically anything with a carousel style autoloader. Or at least something similar.
would anyone know the reason why a m1a2 sep v3 is a LOT more manouverable that challenger 2?
my m1a2 has now 1343 hp with 69.8t and the black prince has 1314hp with 65t
gear ratios and weight distribution and general construction
Without regenerative steering the challengers are at a disadvantage thanks to how things are
Wow, it’s curious to see how this basketball is listed on the T-80s. A basketball that will never be added to the game, for whatever reason.
Im nearly out of forum time.seeing as my games not being played, so ill try keep kt short.
They’ve removed every post where i categorically list ehat has happened
Okay, I’m going to leave a comment too, which they’ll probably delete.
If this is true, it would explain a lot about what’s happening in the game and why the devs aren’t fixing anything important or complicated anymore.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/1ukwrp6/gaijin_in_hungary_royalties_dividends_investments/
PS: Sometimes they’ve deleted my posts without telling me anything at all. In fact, on one funny occasion I copied one of my comments, posted it, and they deleted it three times haha.
Isn’t the 3bm42 distinctly different in construction compared to 3bm22 & 3bm15 which is why it was such a big threat when introduced. Wasn’t it the case that the US were worried Iraqis had their hands on Mango so that’s why the HC/HA came about? They don’t upgrade armor they figure won’t be penetrated. The British actively worked on a whole new turret. Chobham was especially effective against Gen 1 monolithic projectiles. Which 3bm42 wasn’t, it was a long rod. Wasn’t it also the Soviets first? I could be wrong.
Signal boost it. We getting the T-80 unplayable!
Because that’s a Stock M1A2 vs a fully upgraded Challenger 2 in a video game. Also Black Night (not Prince, that’s a whole different tank that doesn’t have 1314 hp, and doesn’t way 65t…)
what?
yes i meant the black night
and a stock m1a2 vs a fully upgraded black night
also im not buying the gear box thing and weith. trying to turn at slow speeds the stock m1a2 is a lot more nimble.