Unironically we should start a “Anti-British Bias in 2026” thread
16 Likes
At this point that honestly should have been started back when challenger 1 first came into the game, because they showed there true colours that day with there response to classified vehicles armour, they did a hole blog on the OG forms about the armour on challenger 1, M1 Abrams e.g and the funny thing was when it came to challenger 1 I had the actual document that they’re used and I pointed out things in it that contradicted what they said back in the blog.
For just an example one section said challenger 1 was immune to all known soviet kinetic and chemical munitions. Which was obviously talking about the ammunition at the time. O but they give some BS and excuses for that part I still get migraines from that day and I honestly lost so many brain cells that day !!🫠
6 Likes
Someone needs to make a discord
I absolutely agree we need a discord. If everyone had a place to talk, we could collect sources and make bug reports, and suggestion threads for gaijin. Of course knowing gaijin, they would deny these reports for “reasons” OR accept and then ignore them. I’m so sick of how the challengers have been treated and something needs to change.
1 Like
Glances at the Supermarine Type 545 suggestion thats been rotting for years, despite being a plane the British Desperately need to counter the Mig-21s and such.
Imagine a Lighting that can turn, and has 2 more Red tops, Plus can carry bombs or rockets if needed.
Im not even British and i get tired of how disrespectful gaijin is to British vehicles.
And honestly ANY vehicles that aren’t russian.
There is a clear absolute Bias on that front.
Someone could show them a napkin drawing made by a Half drunk Russian general showing the T-90 has 1000mm of Composite on the front, and they would accept yet.
Yet The C2 still is in the state its in despite HUNDREDS of reports.
The Abrams too, it has that ahistorical LFP because Gaijin refuses to understand that you can improve composite array’s and the hull not change.
Hell the Challenger 1 and Challenger 2 have the same exact hulls basically, yet the C2’s hull composites are over twice as effective, Why can’t gaijin accept that same logic for the Abrams?
7 Likes
Same thing as the armor on the Tortoise.
Its been proven it had more than 152mm of armor on the front. YET GUESS WHAT.
People just don’t care about that one because the thing is absolutely useless now due to the APHE cupola sniping plauge that morons like Spookston and his fanbase let continue.
3 Likes
You guys did get that one already few years back witt the “rework” the answers wont be changed since them
2 Likes
Thats completely different and like only 2 or 3 thing were actually done and they were minimal.
Russia get more good vehicles in 1 update than britain gets in 1 or 2 years?
1 Like
You’re late
Thats half maltese man
And half Anglo. Just stay away from the Maltese half and you’ll be fine.
There no forum section, or anything. Might make my own and dedicate it to actual challenger 2 stuff with an actual forum for each issue
Just wait 24 hours and something will come up
i posted one but it got closed for apparently being to similar to another thread
If anyone wants to join, DM me for an invite. Its dedicated to discussing Challenger 2s and its Ammo.
theres kobes and flame and uh probably others
doesnt matter, to them its matter is done, nothing new got added since then realy did it?
they worked trough the stuff and decided the other stuff is not worth adding/ not capable and so on.
You can ask for a challenger 2 all you want, but in their minds its already done and not needed anymore
Ive already given up, im off to spade my arietes. If im gonna have shit armour may as well have dm53 while im at it.