Challenger 2 MBT - Technical data and Discussion (Part 2)

There’s nothing that can be done.

While gaijin refuse primary source documents from the people developing the round because it contradicts their world view, and yet they just make up and invent stuff for the most favoured nation then we’re just yelling into the void.

6 Likes

And they just lie to us about fixes. For example the trunion pin report says fixed in next major update yet here we are. It was fixed in the dev for a day or so but they probaly thought. Nyt bruthir t90 canyt lol pen the mantlet remyove it comrade

4 Likes

I tested a shot at the new bottom disc of Chally mk2 fictional basket.
→ 8/10 times spalling most likely killed 2 crew members
→ Othewise, they are red and orange
→ Ofc ring disabled
I still don’t understand why the spall behave so violently and disregard the angle of the shot.

4 Likes

Uploading: War Thunder 2026-06-26 12-21-16.mp4…


This is l27

4 Likes

Spall tanks seem to be working just fine, not a bug.

1 Like

First time seeing actual photo proving the C2 crews keep the SA80s with them.

7 Likes

@Stona_WT can we get an answer similar to your recent “why do we had duplicate vehicles” post regarding the challenger 2s?

Why does Britain/Challenger 2s get neglected so bad?

Why are accepted buy reports still not fixed after 2-3 years?

We do we get bug reports denied when other nations get them accepted with less info or less sufficient info?

Why with official MOD documents and MOD posted facts do we still get suggestions/bug reports denied where other nations in the same situation wouldn’t?

Why does Britain/Challenger 2s have hundreds of accepted bug reports still open for years with silence from devs?

Why when bug reports using official, public factual information and reports from the MOD get put as “not enough info?”

Why when bug reports using official, public factual information and reports from the MOD get put as “forwarded as suggestion” OR “accepted” and left for years?

Is there bias against Britain?

I think the British players want answers of why we are being led around in circles and into dead ends.

18 Likes

Unironically we should start a “Anti-British Bias in 2026” thread

16 Likes

At this point that honestly should have been started back when challenger 1 first came into the game, because they showed there true colours that day with there response to classified vehicles armour, they did a hole blog on the OG forms about the armour on challenger 1, M1 Abrams e.g and the funny thing was when it came to challenger 1 I had the actual document that they’re used and I pointed out things in it that contradicted what they said back in the blog.

For just an example one section said challenger 1 was immune to all known soviet kinetic and chemical munitions. Which was obviously talking about the ammunition at the time. O but they give some BS and excuses for that part I still get migraines from that day and I honestly lost so many brain cells that day !!🫠

6 Likes

Someone needs to make a discord

I absolutely agree we need a discord. If everyone had a place to talk, we could collect sources and make bug reports, and suggestion threads for gaijin. Of course knowing gaijin, they would deny these reports for “reasons” OR accept and then ignore them. I’m so sick of how the challengers have been treated and something needs to change.

1 Like

Glances at the Supermarine Type 545 suggestion thats been rotting for years, despite being a plane the British Desperately need to counter the Mig-21s and such.

Imagine a Lighting that can turn, and has 2 more Red tops, Plus can carry bombs or rockets if needed.

Im not even British and i get tired of how disrespectful gaijin is to British vehicles.

And honestly ANY vehicles that aren’t russian.

There is a clear absolute Bias on that front.

Someone could show them a napkin drawing made by a Half drunk Russian general showing the T-90 has 1000mm of Composite on the front, and they would accept yet.

Yet The C2 still is in the state its in despite HUNDREDS of reports.

The Abrams too, it has that ahistorical LFP because Gaijin refuses to understand that you can improve composite array’s and the hull not change.

Hell the Challenger 1 and Challenger 2 have the same exact hulls basically, yet the C2’s hull composites are over twice as effective, Why can’t gaijin accept that same logic for the Abrams?

7 Likes

Same thing as the armor on the Tortoise.

Its been proven it had more than 152mm of armor on the front. YET GUESS WHAT.

People just don’t care about that one because the thing is absolutely useless now due to the APHE cupola sniping plauge that morons like Spookston and his fanbase let continue.

3 Likes

You guys did get that one already few years back witt the “rework” the answers wont be changed since them

2 Likes

Thats completely different and like only 2 or 3 thing were actually done and they were minimal.

Russia get more good vehicles in 1 update than britain gets in 1 or 2 years?

1 Like

You’re late

Thats half maltese man

And half Anglo. Just stay away from the Maltese half and you’ll be fine.