is the report still under review or has it been denied? cause i dont understand how it could be denied with how much evidence that has been provided should be more than enough for a modern vehicle
2 Likes
As we mentioned the devs are seeking and investigating for more information. Currently as it is, its not sufficient.
Is the DM53 one still under investigation as well, cause that is some confusion as well
1 Like
“its not sufficient”? when you have been given multiple primary sources on L27A1 performance but how is it not enough? players cant get what your asking for and it has been said in the past and idk the exact words but the requirement needed for modern vehicles is lower because information is classified but now your trying to find information or asking for information that cant be legally acquired
1 Like
That one was concluded. As we said, a new report can be made.
So using the same logic - I can submit a report to say that 3BM60 is incorrectly capable of penetrating any armour of the Challenger 2.
Because there is no evidence of a test-firing or any reports that say it can.
Put simply - there is more documentary evidence provided in support of L27’s specific capability than most other modern ammunition in the game.
Which is it going to be? Either you demand the same burden of proof across the board or you inevitably are seen as being inconsistent across different nations.
Is that a genie you want to let out of it’s bottle?
*By ‘you’ I mean - Gaijin generally.
13 Likes
Can be made with new sources as i understood it.
When the main issue was it getting denied for defeating Relikt, when the report talked about K5. Only cause 1 source said T72MB3 have been retrofitted with Relikt. The report has been denied cause of a language barrier problem.
Or are we allowed to resubmit the same report.
Only with an extra explaining the bug report managers language problem?
The report cant be remade with the same sources alone
But there is the problem.
The problem is a language problem on gajins side. They didnt read the german text right
1 Like
but it wasnt the sources that was the issue it was bad translation on gaijins side?
No it cannot be reported like that because its performance and details are well known.
The fact there is no test against CR.2 is irrelevant since its known what CR.2s protection is broadly speaking based on available public sources.
Yet the same could be said of T-80U?
Do you see the conflict here?
2 Likes
so is L27A1s performance. but apparently gaijin knows better than the british ministry of defence
its also known how incorrect it is ingame
Sadly its not the case. Since L27s current performance cant do that against T-80U.
As mentioned, even with the ERA stripped off.
1 Like
Fine. It would appear that the devs have made their minds up. I appreciate the response and the somewhat careful balancing act you are having to do.
2 Likes
current performance in game or in real life? because the sources you (“you” being gaijin) were provided says otherwise and ingame the T80U armour is known to be overperforming and L27A1 is known to be underperforming
5 Likes
Primary real world documentation saying it can should trump “in game it can’t” and things should be adjusted accordingly.
Either L27a1 is underperforming or the T80u armour is over performing. This document proves one of these to be the case.
3 Likes
literally ~10mm away from penetrating
good thing it’s only a suggestion then Community Bug Reporting System
1 Like
Well, at least we know that realism and common sense aren’t important in the game.Avoid a few arguments on the forum haha.
1 Like