Challenger 2 MBT - Technical data and Discussion (Part 2)

We do not speak of the strela in our minecraft server sir, would you mind taking that to the russian tt disscusians were it belongs. (meant as a joke, but i would rather stop playing than use that… thing).

1 Like

Stormer can reliably kill mbts, or most of them anyway. Leo 2s are especially nice because its not some wacky spot unlike the abrams.

( I feel the same way its why i dont own the stormer I dont want to buy the russian junk before it)
i know its banging spaa but fk that

I have a terrible fear that the russians are going to get the buk in the update after the upcoming one, and the brits are going to get a indian skinned version of that.

Stuff for the italians was mentioned on the russian dev stream, but nothing about the sky sabre.

I will absolutely lose my forum privileges if that happens.

2 Likes

Reckon i will too btw mate.im proper fed up with it all rn

genuinely BTW that new HF24 is bloody useless for the BR as well on the topic of indian stuff, it flies worse than my yak38 xD

And hunt 2S38s and light tanks with it.

Yeah that is funny too

India also doesnt use the BUK M3…
So we would have a worse version of it too.

1 Like

I dont find that to be remotely true.
You used to be able to now though MBTs just eat them

The vehicles in the british trees from other nations are literally: You will get diluted down versions of what everyone else gets and be happy about it.

5 Likes

Who won?

Yamato, of course) You can’t penetrate normally it at this distance.
But it was quite funny to watch the shells of his main caliber evaporate right in front of the tank)

1 Like

ive spent far too long in test drive finding the spots to do it, some are such a pain in the ass its basically impossible (the abrams for no reason lol). but the leo is quite nice, especially as its accessible from the front. Its a little difficult to hit but you have 16 atgms and theres no point in keeping any if your getting rushed so its more a nice trick to keep in my back pocket. On average it takes about 5-6 for a leo, maybe less if im lucky.

I was looking at making a bug report about the ready rack with the CR1/2’s, given how it was accepted 2 years back, and they still haven’t fixed it.
In search of info I found interior photo’s of the CR2, clearly displaying the interior, showing the ready rack and the rest of the interior, I thought it would of been classified still, just want to double check with some of you more knowledgable about this sort of thing.

This?
Fmg3aO9XoAcFP0G

2 Likes

Basically yes, although the ones I found were at a different angle, that by the look of the photo provided seems to all be from the same collection of photos, wasn’t sure if it was classified or not still, as to my knowledge I thought the CR2’s interior was classified.

I ended up doing some other research about the Challenger 2 In-game, and found that the Challenger 2’s should probably use L26 as their stock round, given every other tank around 11.7-12.0’s stock/first APFSDS round pen is around the same of the L26, and even some tanks like the Leo 2A4 (10.7) using the same cannon as the Leo 2A5 (12.0), but the Leo 2A5, doesn’t require using the same rounds that the 2A4 does, even though its the same cannon. But for some reason, the Challenger 2’s don’t have that benefit, and keep the weaker APFSDS round’s all the way till 12.0

Just decided to make a post about it, if you want to check it out:

Given we are one of the few that never had to deal with HEAT stock I think we should just be fortunate they didn’t decide to give us HESH stock instead we do have APFSDS stock, it might be weak, but its better than the alternatives and out of all the issues the CR2 has, stock loadouts probably aren’t the one to worry about at the moment and instead fight for more universal stock grind changes like moving L27A1 and other T4 shells to T3