I mean actual centurions that are british, out with south african and such.
But yeah the oli is infact the best one, though the MK2 isnt really a cent anymore.
the fact we have centurion 1 through 13 and only have 3 of those actual british ones in the tech tree is pretty poor.
Yeah I thought I had seen that somewhere actually.
Do you know whats even sillier, the “CR3 TD” being stripped out of its turret spall liners etc, which makes no sense to fire that 120mm rheimental gun inside it! they already trialed a CR2 with that exact gun in 2006 as part of the CLIP program! without stripping the tanks internals xd so why does the 3TD in game not even facilitate the base levels of protection a CR2 has to meet.
i imagine it’s mostly electronics and stuff that doesnt factor into war thunder, they might have had to remove the spall liner for fitting the new systems and as a non-combat demonstrator they weren’t refitted. As far as I’m aware there’s no photos of the inside of the BN so while it’s possible the same happened there, there’s no evidence for it.
I hear clip had very limited ammo stowage, and the photo I’ve seen looks like 6 rounds of stowage.
theres loads of tanks with incorrect ammo values right now as it sits, im sure they could find a way to make the 2006 clip CR2 work better than this damn abomination of a CR3.
im aware the clip project was panned and so on, however the “CR3 TD” in game is not even right at all, teh fact a T55A can one tap it through the front of the turret is wild af
My apoligies however the 2006 clip program CR2 would be more fitting in the game RN than the abomonation that is the 3TD.
The fact its slower than a CR2 when it actively has less in it, e.g spall liner missing, and no roof MG etc yet is slower than the CR2 from the early 2000s… as if the CR2 platform it was based off of suddenly would have a worse engine etc.
Oh, 100% the challengers are getting the utterly stupid turret basket nerf, its just a matter of time.
Gaijin really, really, really need to think again about this turret basket thing, it’s the most ridiculous thing in the game since scharnhost and the ch2’s mantlet.
honestly, I’d like it if any and all the little bits they could add were modelled, because even the smallest bit of sheet metal could act as a spawl catcher. these things could include, empty ammo holding frames, empty ammo boxes, radio boxes, radios, holders for weapons, doors and hydraulic struts for IFV’s, crew and dismount seats in IFV’s like the Bradley and Warrior crew and dismount seats, separating walls inside vehicles, engine firewalls, CBRN filters, air vents, mortar hatches, external boxes like equipment boxes, even if its only 1mm/2mm of steel, that’s still SOMETHING that could do something and could even catch spawl and help the survivability even if its incredibly minor. I realize all that additional stuff would made the inside of vehicles really cluttered, but we have the xray filter for a reason.
correct, there are photos of challenger 2 with its turret on a crane; no basket in sight.
Courtesy of da12thmonkey in British weapon systems forum topic.
Just as a small note; that picture could be used as an example as to where the breach should located vertically while the barrel is laid flat. Right now in game, it sits too high, and this is a good example of the gun/breach laying directly flat; so if anyone needs a picture as proof for a big report, you wont get better than this.
Regarding Challenger 2, there is a manual that details the internal structure of the hull, which shows the rotational structure associated with the bottom of the hull and the tank turret, but considering that there may be confidentiality issues, I will not show it here.
