Challenger 2 MBT - Technical data and Discussion (Part 1)

I’m sure with enough digging you can find patents that would correlate to some of the CR2 Armour kits

This is just an example of one patent: GB2200437A - Reactive armour - Google Patents

The gun handling should be lower sadly.

You sure isn’t it different between the two

Hmm?

Time to get to work guys

1 Like

I’m sorry I know this is the wrong thread, but what. Mig-15 & Early Sabre to 8.0 lmao. Can’t wait to have to fight that in my Spitfire Mk 24

2 Likes

Yeah… They also forgot the Hunter F1 exists

4 Likes

The handling between the CR1 and CR2 shouldn’t the CR2 be better or the same not worse

Is that simple deduction I hear, begone. This is gaijin bitch.

6 Likes

Given I didn’t fall asleep during TEC’s video, I was awake to hear him make a good point:

Where the hell is the Swift F.1 and F.7
The Venom, the Sea Hawk? What about the French 8.0-9.0 jets? They all got glossed over, and some of those need to be moved down in tandem with the current changes if they are carried out.

4 Likes

The games a total s*** show for many reasons. nothing should surprise anyone anymore.

War Thunder is just a cash cow for the devs.

4 Likes

Venom still being 8.7 is funny. Something as fast as a prop is having to face jets like the 2T? I tried flying it but all it was is everyone running away from you and you end up dying to some random from space who wasn’t spotted.

1 Like

This is reported to be from Challenger 2. I don’t know the source.

5 Likes

Where did you find this picture?

Ye

It’s got the same amount of armour by the looks of things

1 Like

https://sturgeonshouse.ipbhost.com/topic/1611-britons-are-in-trouble/?do=findComment&comment=192051

Object-477 posted about it too on Weibo: https://m.weibo.cn/status/5023192794794911

4 Likes

Holy ***k that’s the best interpretation ive seen so far

someone madel a model there that makes a lot of sense

Spoiler

10 Likes

Challenger 2 turret in production

Spoiler


2 Likes