Challenger 2 MBT - Technical data and Discussion (Part 1)

Im a fan now TrickZZter isnt even translating the dev’s comments for us so we have to do it ourself on the bug reports.

For instance on this report Community Bug Reporting System
image

“When talking about a rotor thickness of 400mm, the player does not take into account the fact that 400mm is the maximum size achieved at one point. At the same time, the report does not contain any evidence for the theses that the player states.
Closed, no error”

4 Likes

This links don’t work.

Thats how it works, probably if he doesn’t translate them because some parts could miss or misunderstood, just use a translator its not that deep.

1 Like

“Im too lazy to open google translator, so im going to ask a tech moderator to personally translate a Russian response, with google translator on the most case, because i don’t want to spend 20 seconds, also i’d want to take the risk of losing important informations on the process because 80% of the EU tech moderators here don’t talk Russian probably, so they cannot give me an accurate traduction.”

Have a good day.

My god i hate this

The mantlet in wt is 300-330

image


War Thunder Screenshot 2024.03.13 - 15.29.09.22

Don’t

No

Yeah don’t ?

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/4mQq8HZowwAs
image

“the shots in the screenshot are fired at that part of the tower where there is no composite and there should not be
Not a mistake. In this case, the shelling is carried out in a weakened zone where there is no combined armor”

Love gaijin just saying yeah there are massive holes in the CR2 turret face because uh we believe so

Its like this on the majority of CR2 reports since the remodel, basically gaijin stating they think its so poorly armoured yet so heavy it makes a king tiger look effective for its weight.

3 Likes

Do you have a link to that guys paper?

–__-- i give up

2 Likes

Understandable, im waiting for them to just ignore the ASPRO-HMT report again.

Look me dead in the eye and tell me that this is fine
image

1 Like

Not to mention the turret checks also seemed to have gotten a need considering the amount of shots that have went clean through after the recent update…… bet they’ll say that was part of the model update as well instead of accepting that their games a buggy mess.

Im not even about protection. It spall in the middle of the composite thicness, meaning that that half is not there. Thats not a bug?

Atleast it ain’t like the Merkava

Oh no yeah im aware its just appalling the “job” theyve done. at the very least they didnt lie that “in someplaces protection may decrease” lmao!

The messaging is clear it seems, they choose to deny reality and facts and logic be dammed.

You cannot reason someone out of a position they didn’t reason themselves into in the first place.

I am going to stop now, as if I said what I actually wanted to say I would be banned but suffice to say, their responses are insulting and downright ridiculous, and the quality of work which they produce is sub standard and quite frankly crap.

7 Likes

I find it harder to kill Merkava’s too but challengers usually are just one taps for me and they go boom whilst Merkava’s it takes 2-4 shots in some rare scenarios ~it does need a buff in the turret tho~