What is this meant to prove its still 90% 200mm and besides even at 400mm what shell cant pen 400mm flat at 11.3 even HEAT can lolpen
Where were you when fireball was reporting？
Although there are still many issues, this is already much better than before
before DEV 0.28， CR2 mantlet can stop DM33( 481)
after 0.28 Gaijin changed something
how is it reducing los if i shoot the front of the turret? the extra angle actually makes it have even more los
It is obvious that it is still wip In the protection analysis, Mantlet did not even have a rotor and pins
Ah yes, the new foldered armor of the TTD, didn’t ya know?
Yea, the armour hole that was supposed to be fixed. It is not fixed for now
Let’s all agree that this is a bug and will be fixed. However we will need to send in a lot of accurate bug reports in order for them to fox it properly instead of quickly rushing it out and leaving us with this for the next couple of months. So let’s find as many inaccuracy’s as we can to send in.
4 Likes
if you look at xray the 2 rha plates in the turret cheecks overlap with the side armour composite
oh and this patch made the cr2E top tier over the 3 td lol
Absolute clownery
@Gunjob @Smin1080p guess the devs still havent shared they imaginery sources for this ?
8 Likes
They did, on my bug report here: Community Bug Reporting System
and here: Community Bug Reporting System
Sorry guys for of topic, but look what i found at battle.
💀
2 Likes
Thankyou, I will now proceed to use this until it is fixed lol.
1 Like
i think he means the part about it being aluminium
For what the thickness? That was discussed here and it was discovered to be correct or do you mean the materials?
Oh, yeah. No actual source on that that I’ve seen.
Actually, except this
but it doesn’t actually give any evidence other than stating it.
2 Likes
the material, for the thickness we had legwolfs bug reports
For now I’ll agree with the thickness as it seems you are correct, however someone posted a picture a few days ago of an even better look of the plate and it showed it being thicker in the centre. I don’t know if this is the mud guard still but we may want to have another look at it.
For the material it should still be rha. But then again with the new thickness in the centre may show that it is aluminium as it accounts for the missing weight…
i mean we still have the question if it would only be the thickness in game why are the support braces then not extending more inward under the top cover?
