Challenger 2 MBT - Technical data and Discussion (Part 1)

You can see in the sheet he linked, gaijin uses 18600 for DU as a standard.

1 Like

cr1x
GCE
FIG2
fig24
GCE2


@Torpon993
If the reason for facing inward is that you believe L30 and L11A5 have the same structure, Trunnions. However, the mantlet structure of CR1 is completely different, and there are no Trunnions like CR1, so this hole is not intended for use with this component.

MOUNTING

You also agreed with my guess about the rotor structure, so there is no need to leave a hole inside at all.

FIG2
Is the Solash protection is same as spall liner?
@Fireball_2020 @DevilO6

No lmao, thats a Splash guard, against water getting into the turret via the gun mount

yea i noticed but i cant seem to find theyr pen values in the LO calc.


there you go, the same values ingame.

so were suposed to put 0 obliquity?

1 Like

Im not sure how it all works myself since penetration and perforation is not the same thing, but if you would put 60 deg for example you would get 659.3 mm, so I just did it for 0 deg as an example, to show that we would get the exact same value as ingame.

how about L28A1 which is 660

660 tungsten

Did gaijin close the dev server?

Yes its down

do you have the picture for L28A1? (just out of curiosity)

Give me a sec, i need to find it

image
And someone taping it

but if i see that correctly it would be 660mm with fins, the penetrator is then much shorter then 660mm in that case

We cant be sure, but the end of the tape seems to not be placed at the end of the fins

yes difficult to say at that angle

what do we know about diameter, weight and mv?

Sadly i dont think it is at the tank museum anymore, so no one can replicate that photo