@Smin1080p since it is now officially on the dev server (i know subject to change) but could you ask the devs if they can provide any sources on why the backingplate is aluminium and if they are aware of the bug reports regarding the thickness of the backplate that were passed. It would be a shame if the armor rework is just done as per the devblog without taking into account the loads of bug reports that were created in response to it
5 Likes
@Fireball_2020 The mantlet on the right has a higher KE than the mantlet on the left. The KE below the rotor is too low and illogical. Everything is mixed up
1 Like
It has it? I don’t understand
ASPRO itself is composed of the ERA and Passive armour…
Isn’t it 200 in game?
it said 200 but the The actual thickness of the model is 300-330
2 Likes
Oh ok good
It should be 70(56°) + 30 + 300-400 + 50 How close are we to that in game.
however, in the protection analysis, it is 30+30+30+200
I believe the reason Mantlet has a thickness of 300-330 is because I compared its thickness with Hull
Yes, trunnion pins and their locks
The trunnions aren’t included anywhere on the modelling? Not even as part of the gun?
RUS MBT have
Nope, they were missing before and are missing now
The ammo changes are interesting
1 Like
Blow out pannels are red
and Cr3 does not have them (as it should)
