Just you projecting your own actions on to others.
Oh the irony of saying people are projecting.
8 Likes
Get this man a true
I have been trying to limit my exposure to you.
That’s why I did not feel much need to respond to many of your claims lately. Others rebuke them well enough.
3 Likes
I love cas at ground battles but don’t reduce the cas multiplier :D
Now that I have LAV-AD, I can very confidently say that anyone who thinks stingers that are weak just has a severe case of skill issue. A K/D of 2.6 would already be pretty impressive for a subpar player, but gets even better though. 10 of those deaths were to tanks, not planes, and you can check this yourself since none of the replays were separated by a major update. It wasn’t even hard. The missile literally did 99% of the work. All that was required of me was to look at the airspawn and flick up when firing incase there were any obstructive objects.
K/D of 7.0 with a “weak” missile played by a subpar player is, in my opinion, a pretty good indicator that said missile is far from being weak. If anything, stinger vehicles should move up, especially ones with both stingers AND a radar/IRST guided autocannon.
Spoiler
LAV-AD is good at it’s BR. It stretches thin at higher BRs due to the shorter lock on range and you get destroyed by helis or CAS with longer range weapons. It lacks on the larger maps due to the ~6K or so lock on.
Yet people still think stingers are bad, even at 9.7 🤣
We said they are balanbed at the br.
U are the one claiming they are to strong at 9.7.
At higher brs stingers become useless cause of the range yes.
They fit perfectly at ~ 9.7.
Where ballistic computers become slowly realy the standard
2 Likes
Stingers should all be 10.0 minimum. LAV-AD should move to 10.3 along with Gepard 1A2
Don´t be kidding. Vehicles like Machbet are perfectly fine at their br.
Idk much abt the Machbet. I don’t know if I’ve ever even fought one before. Assuming it’s just a fatter LAV-AD with no Hydras, it could easily move to 10.0 and still be very powerful
Good that you were proven wrong multiple times already
1 Like
All it’s been proven is that ppl who complain about CAS suffer from nothing but their own skill issue.
1 Like
Says the one suffering from skill issue fighting against them
And such a suprise.
But most Cas players arent skilled either.
The spaas are needed against the skilled players.
Else they dominate
dont break his world like that
1 Like
Sorry, but you being bad at SPAA is not because CAS is too strong. But ofc, you need to keep spinning the narrative that all CAS players are bad and all SPAA players are pros (although it’s more so the opposite) because your argument just falls apart without it.
I found it great how your argument just automaticaly falls to me having to be bad lol.
Whem factualy the gepard1a2 couldnt even hit a 10 with maverick, su 25 with equivalents etc.
Gepards dont have the range neither do stingers
Wow, one singular vehicle isn’t able to make an entire class of vehicles completely unplayable. That one singular vehicle is definitely too weak, and the issue definitely isn’t with the person using it.
Last time I was required by ground guys to check BRs lmao
Not to mention a10 is among the best, and only after the mav buff
Proof of never played and I would not tell you why. Find it out yourself =D
2 Likes