I wish the use of Large Language Models, except for ~1:1 translation, was banned on these forums.
translation is the only valid use of AI in my opinion
it isnt a reliable source, it can be manipulated to say certain things and often is just halucinating something half true togther
ontop of stoping some ppl to think for themselves
3 Likes
Cry more… It’s a definition and it’s accurate.
Not for the usages I have put forth in here.
It’s accurate, don’t deny it.
and why did you need to use AI for that?
arent you able to put a simple thought together on your own?
Because I couldn’t be assed making a big long post when I knew that AI can easily just make it for me, and I read it, and took it as fine because I understand what I wanted to put forth.
It’s not so much about thinking, it’s about workload and the fact I couldn’t be bothered… You can call it lazy, but I don’t care… You try and disprove what’s been put up.
It hasn’t been manipulated or coached into the answer it gave.
then you shouldnt do it instead of making half assed arguments
iam sorry for you that you need something that should be common sense spelled out by AI
all AI manages to achive is invalidate your argument/ makes you look stupid
and even better is that i shared my personal opinion and you feel attacked by it
3 Likes
Well, that’s a topic for another thread.
The DISCUSSION is about the ‘CAS problem’ not limited to the demands for action that others have put.
You think that’s the case so you can feel like you’ve got the upper hand, but it’s genuinely just the case that you are nitpicking and trying to make an argument for the sake of it.
These insults are pretty stupid to be honest…
‘It’s not my fault you can’t understand discussion’ ‘It’s not my fault you’re that dumb that you can’t form your own opinion’
Literal skill issue. You can’t do anything, but most people can
2 Likes
Depends on what scenery they referring to. 1 vs 1 meaning a tank vs plane then he’s correct regardless of skill. But they like to only focus and use that argument for TO and leave out the other scenarios and line up options ignoring the core design of the game. I said this a lot, but CAS is only a problem when players allow it.
Can’t go on the battlefield without a SPAA in my line up. I feel powerless without a counter.
3 Min in and already shot down a fully loaded F4U-4 by paying attention on air and ground and the only one doing Air Alert call outs lol Very consistent on downing CAS almost every game.
KD: 9.11 on this SPAA
Either way, players have a right to wishlist for TO. Up to Gaijin to change their mind or be persuaded by players to add one which I doubt they will.
3 Likes
you literally have to, to even have the sp to spawn a plane, what kind of double think is this?
This is 100% correct, you can ignore planes but don’t complain when you die to them, pretty simple concept.
This is bad framing since both teams can spawn planes, you just complain when it happens to you. You cant beat em join em, and if you don’t like it you are playing the wrong game.
because you are playing RB not sim lmao what kind of argument is this, you people need help.
another moronic argument, the whole game is predicated on team comp to succeed. You cant just have spaa or you lose and you just cant have all tanks or you lose to planes. This is why you have a line up and can spawn many times in the game. If your team decides to not take advantage thats tough. But you want to cope when you die to planes and claim its no fair. YEAH THATS THE POINT LMAO. You also cant win sitting in air either. This entire thread is just filled with massive cope.
REEEE my leopard 2a7 died to a b17 1.7 plane therefore BR doesnt matter, what a joke.
you are playing the wrong game then bye!
You want this, not me. I want to continue to bomb people like you who think they shouldn’t have to play or deal with planes. Thank you for your RP and SL when I bomb you lmao.
thats part of the game, lmao more mega cope
Irony so bad I literally just had a stroke.
cry about it edit, stop false flagging
1 Like
Lmao, 66 replies on my notifications since I last checked here a few hours ago (when there were hundreds of new posts).
Undoubtedly it was all worthwhile, as is the norm here. 😆
1 Like
- spaa are often used in arcade, where they actually have a chance to shoot down the planes
- Many countries have HUGE gaps in their spaa trees - Japan and France are good examples
- The ww2 spaas (using cannons and no radar) are at a huge disadvantage vs the CAS they encounter - doubly so when uptiered, which happens 3/4 of the time
- Some (many?) players just want tank vs tank battles. Why not give them that option?
1 Like
They also have a chance to shoot down planes in GRB
That is true, those gaps in vehicles are the reason these nations are “minor nations”.
People just suck using them. Just stop staying in spawn or shooting at planes which are way too far away to hit.
And in the range around 8.0-10.0 SPAA is way stronger than CAS, with exceptions. But we tend to forget that i guess.
Because it’s another mode which will split the playerbase and increase waiting times.
WW2 does not encompass BR 8.0-10.
And at BR 8.0+ spaa still face CAS that can outrange them. The Veak 40 at 7.7 uses canons that are outranged by the 2km ATGMs that many CAS can be equipped with.
Your “reasoning” that they ‘suck’ is a baseless argument. It adds nothing to the discussion.
As for the splitting aspect…
- there are a LOT of players in the game at any moment. If you have to wait an extra 30 seconds to get in a battle, the extra wait time is a small price to pay for players to get in a mode they are comfortable with.
1 Like
And if matches actually last the full length of 25 minutes, or at least 20 - then 30 seconds of waiting is nothing in playtime:waiting relation.
I’d much rather wait an extra 30 seconds to get an experience I enjoy throughout rather than one where I wait 30 seconds and within 3-5 minutes the skies turn into corsairs and yaks and hellcats making respawning in slow and heavy things or unagile light things suicide.
30 seconds for 3-5 minutes of fun is a much, much worse ratio than 60 seconds for 20 minutes of fun.
2 Likes
Be carefull he is trying rage baiting on this topic.
Japan as a “minor nation”. Interesting…
Still does not address my point.
Anyone playing Japan rank V vehicles has to rely on an early rank IV spaa. And for France - same - playing rank V garage and they need to rely on rank IV vehicle (THAT ONLY HAS GUN ELEVATION OF 50 deg).
Not reasonable IMHO.
1 Like
Even though Japan does lack a Rank V SPAA, Type 99 SPH does a very good job dealing with CAS very reliably. But yes, it sucks to use the 5.3 SPAA at 7.3 line up. This is where Thailand comes into play though once Thailand ground gets introduced as a sub tree in Japan TT. Soon though, its a coming. They have the SPAA needed for Rank V+
1 Like
If you can’t deal with gaps in vehicle lineups, don’t play minor nations, it’s that easy.
And you wonder why players want TO. You just can’t read the room can you.
Le sigh.
2 Likes