Only 1 of the new AA missiles can reach 25km lol.
aim120c 7 have long range, i ever got killed in range 20km+
i hope their give rest nation good AA because we got mix nation so maybe 1 nation can got more than 1 diferent high tier AA from other nation in their tech tree
Eh after 12.5 km the missile is already below Mach 1, so the enemy plane has to be absolutely braindead to not dodge a C-7 beyond 15km. Fortunately, or unfortunately depending on your pov, most players aren’t very good/smart.
Also it takes the missile so long to get to that range the plane has all the time to launch everything and turn around before the missile is anywhere close.
Honestly just making the Spyder actually good and further buff the CS/SA5 would already be a good start.
Lemme hold up a mirror for you to look at.
2 Likes
What’s a mirror going to do? I always cited the 2017 data to discuss 2017…which is wholly legitimate. Of course you use 2017 data to discuss 2017 matters, that’s how commentary works…contemporary information! (Still, you objected to that and cried foul complaining about the ‘confusion’ of others who cannot read well.)
Here we have someone plainly claiming that 2017 data applies to 2025…and you have no objections. You keep fixating on me for whatever reason.
Your critique has been wholly selective with a clear double standard as it succumbs to bias. I had figured as much before…and now you’ve just confirmed it: good job. I can safely dismiss it on that basis.
When (if) you get serious about the 2025 data use, we can take up what I said again. Until then, I can laugh it off.
Edit: False flaggers are very desperate to hide this, lol. Gaijin needs to ban false flagging trolls
1 Like
Just spawn a tank, bro.
1 Like
You need to get some better data (and one-liners), lol
Citing 2017 data for 2025 doesn’t help anyone and those who false-flagged my posts are just embarrassing.
Says the one famous for flagging everyone
2 Likes
Wrong again, lol! That fake claim was made up by forum trolls who flagged their own posts to portray themselves as victims.
I don’t stoop to false flagging (that’s beneath me), I only flag rule breaking/off-topic posts as proper users do. Anything else?
Sure sure, you totally don’t mass flag arguments. I know a few guys that you’ve mass reported, but that’s behind us now. Instead of crying about SPAAs, just get good and spawn a tank, bro.
1 Like
Lmao…you must be confusing me for someone else.
All I said about you (and not even to you) is that you were citing lousy (outdated) data–nothing about SPAAs or balance (or even your basic claim)!
I lead the teams I’m on…I’ve already ‘gotten good.’ Anything more you want to say?
Nah, but as I said, I’ve known people you have reported. Galwaylion says “hello”
I have no interest with false flagging and do not engage in that…but if you do violate the rules, nobody is obligated to tolerate that. (Having to violate the rules to try ‘winning’ an argument is embarrassing anyway)
It’s not my fault if others violate the rules and get punished…that’s 100% on them.
You can stop lying and acting smug, not anyone’s fault that you have to false flag everyone to act like you’re winning an argument. It also must be sad to be so weak that words online hurt you so much.
Also, I’m willing to accept my data might be outdated, by it does not change the fact that CAS is OP and SPAAs need buffing.
1 Like
There’s no lie in what I said nor smugness…just the facts. I only flag posts that are rule violating or (rarely) off-topic. What others post is completely out of my control and not ‘my fault’ lol
Contrary to what you seem to think, what others say doesn’t effect me (frankly, it usually doesn’t matter)…they’re usually just wrong and I help enlighten them as a matter of charity. I don’t have any issue winning arguments…nor do I have to resort to breaking rules to do so. :)
That should settle it.
Lmao, as I said a few minutes ago:
Regarding things as they are now, I have declined to comment on your stance or how things are…I only said the data you were citing to make your point was terribly outdated.
I did not say anything about current conditions.
Don’t bother it’s his singular clip of doing anything positive in an SPAA
1 Like
If I was playing against him - he would ragequit
Scratch that, i read it completely wrong. Ignore this. lol yikes
You go with that. Go with claiming my bias yet you clearly cannot see your own bias. You hide behind a facade of objectivity, but that facade is pretty thin.
But you go with what you wish to go with. Make claims and then backpedal. Be intellectually dishonest.
You do you. As long as you can claim you are objective, despite the evidence, you just do you.
2 Likes
Bold words for someone who is negative in most of his GRB vehicles.
4 Likes