Stop falling for his provocations dude
Lmao…I simply told it like it is.
That’s not provocative…or is it?
Wrong. You didn’t. I told you to specifically read air on ground and read ground to air. You kept adding in air on air to say that SPAAs are equal to CAS, as if SPAAs are also secretly planes too.
He is baiting you
Nope…I never claimed SPAAs were equal to aircraft. On the contrary, I not only pointed out their differences (in SP costs) but emphasized the importance of considering the various vehicle types counted in the statistics and why it matters (I literally just did this a few minutes ago).
Because of the very limited filtration of the data, the kill data had to be parsed out by its totals (kills to all causes) or it would be skewed by its own limitations. Once again: most ground vehicles are not even trying to target aircraft (many lack practical means to do so), so it would be ridiculous to try counting them as though all ground vehicles do.
Not at all. I’m trying to have a serious discussion here and others’ poor grasp of the game and how analysis is done is preventing that. Worse, it seems many of the people here despise the very idea of anything but an echo chamber or groupthink…it’s tragic really.
With these sorts of issues, I can see how the same people end up outplayed and defeated…they’d easily get flummoxed by their opponents and surroundings.
I have explained to you precisely why the angle you have mentioned was unusable (insufficient data filtration) many times…your chatter doesn’t change this.
I haven’t ignored the statistics, I have embraced and understood them. Others just haven’t or cannot.
Airstrike Mod reduces CAS SP when spotting*. I tried pushing it to the limit, and was able to spawn 4x Mavs Gripen w/ 122sp. When I died, I just respawned with 4x Mavs w/ 300sp. You can easily scout a ton of people on a map where there’s a common kill-zone and easily get 2 CAS for a heavily discounted price, without getting a single kill or even an objective capture.
*I believe it is when you get an assist from spotting (Intelligence)
Goes both ways, so who is it overpowered for? Every player is capable of destroying them, deploying them and scouting with them.
Exactly
Yea i know how the game works, i still don’t understands how this relates the drones we are talking about.
Funny, when you say the same about aircrafts, the CAS hater horde gets mad.
Yea, will take a while to grind it, but I’ll give it a shot once I do. I’d say it “keeps tankers safe” due to SAMs keeping the CAS busy towards them instead of tanks. Some get away with it, but its better than before at least. There was way more CAS killing tanks, now its a lot less thanks to the IRIS-T.
Warrior wasn’t even the one that brought up 2017 stats first to begin with…that i know for sure.
as if SPAAs are also secretly planes too.
Planes are actually flying tanks
~warrior412
If he counts air on air kills as a part of the SPAA statistics, does that mean we should count ground on ground kills for why CAS is OP?
Inventing fake quotes, SMH…you are only destroying your own credibility and hurting yourself by lying like this.
Now no one can believe anything you say when you’ll readily resort to lies.
If he counts air on air kills as a part of the SPAA statistics, does that mean we should count ground on ground kills for why CAS is OP?
It’s painfully apparent from quotes like this that you don’t understand why the analysis was as it was and why I said what I did.
For about the fourth or fifth time: the limitations of the data filtration are why it was necessary to count kills by aircraft versus losses of aircraft. Again:

Once again: most ground vehicles are not even trying to target aircraft (many lack practical means to do so), so it would be ridiculous to try counting them as though all ground vehicles do.
That is why you cannot look from the angle you complain about with the data as it is…it’s amazing you still haven’t understood that.
Warrior wasn’t even the one that brought up 2017 stats first to begin with…that i know for sure
It’s refreshing to see someone that’s finally awake here!
As with SPAA use, more people need to emulate you on reading Juicy…that skill has clearly fallen off.
Pretty much every interaction with forum CAS haters ends up like this.
❎ Called nonsense because your logic is flawed
✅ Called nonsense because you disagree with them
Too poor to afford a premium?
Lmao, as usual, you’re wrong:
I have premium active right now and for many years prior too…even before you began playing, haha
maybe stop wasting your time posting nonsense at the forum
My posts are accurate and informed…and you know that. You had to resort to peddling nonsense because you had no real argument with what I’d actually said…and you know that too.
By stooping to hoaxes, you’ve destroyed your own credibility and now no one can/will ever trust your words. It’s very sad but you did it all to yourself.
do something useful like get a part-time job or something
Lmao, I already have a full work week
I still have time to deal with that, WT (gameplay and forums) and everything else that comes with everyday life (family, hobbies, etc) too. It’s actually a lot like RB GFs:
Some people can comprehend and handle all that is going on around them…some other people cannot.
I am too modest to say much more beyond that, but I appreciate your interest in me…wait for the biopic!
I don’t waste my time arguing with someone who is a lifetime freeloader.
“freeloader” 😂
Spoiler
Active premium since before you even started playing WT and premiums in every tree too, lmfao
Also: learn how F2P games operate…elitism, especially misplaced as it was here, doesn’t do you any good.
Your levity is good…but humiliating yourself with nonsensical claims only worsens your credibility issues.
✅ Called nonsense because you disagree with them
The real “crime” here was saying something they do not like and cannot argue with.
It’s not hard to understand how and why people who cannot even fashion an attempt at an argument end up outplayed and defeated. That’s just their fate, on the forums and in-game, I suppose.
Okay Steven Crowder, we get it. Air to air kills are caused by SPAAs because SPAAs distracted the plane from another plane, that’s why they died and why the air to air kills are tied to SPAAs.
Okay Steven Crowder, we get it. Air to air kills are caused by SPAAs because SPAAs distracted the plane from another plane, that’s why they died and why the air to air kills are tied to SPAAs.
Obviously, you don’t get it.
Despite numerous detailed explanations, you still do not understand data filtration, why it matters and its importance in analyses like the one(s) you asked about. It appears wholly futile trying to explain any of it to you.
It’s absolutely hilarious that the CAS mains are sticking together with their delusions.
Loyalty to the truth and facts =/= delusion nor that a person is a “CAS main” or even “sticking together” with someone else…if two people both say “2+2 = 4” because that’s correct, are they ‘math mains’ because of it? C’mon, be serious!😂
Bloating the thread and resorting to violating the forum rules doesn’t help your case either. That just perpetuates the existent stereotype of CAS complainers…which is not a good look.
I wish I could help you out, but there’s little that can be done it seems…you haven’t grasped the lifesavers I’ve tossed to you.
Funny, because it’s all clear to everyone else that AIR to GROUND eliminations far exceed GROUND to AIR. You want to randomly add in air to air to pad the stats and act like it is equal. Newsflash boyo, it’s not. How many times have I asked you to read off the stats. Black and white, clear as crystal.
AIR VEHICLES take out MORE GROUND VEHICLES. Simple as that. It is so painfully obvious, but yet you keep adding in random statistics like accidents and air to air eliminations. YOU are the one misunderstanding the entire premise of everything, because YOU are so daft! You want to act like an intellectual and write out five pages of nonsense, BUT YOU REFUSE TO READ FOR FIVE SECONDS THE STATISTICS THAT SHOW THE AIR TO GROUND VS GROUND TO AIR.
Alrighty…
No matter how passionate you might be about something, there’s always a kind and respectful way to put your thoughts into words. What happened in the last 5 to 10 messages (including the deleted ones) literally throws that into the bin.
Now, to avoid ending up with punishments and what not, it is highly advised to immediately cut any sort of offending behavior towards other users. Particularly, let’s avoid any use / variation of definitions related to people’s cognitive abilities.
As a sidenote, those who did do what we’ve just stated above did get punished, so let’s do ourselves a favor and avoid that.
Things can now proceed smoothly.