Hey, not my problem that some players decided to play as bomb target for me.
And i think the .50cals should be nerfed, because the bomb targets shouldn’t shoot at me and damage my engine
5 Likes
You are not the actual WT player though, since you only seal club low tier, this makes you even less qualified on this subject. At least CC can actually get hundred thousand of players to vote, you on the other hand, can’t even attract a fly. You wanna downplay their role at least demonstrate somehow that you are worth more than these people you tryna downplay lmao
3 Likes
How balanced is this
2 Likes
The grom1 was removed because it was too easy to kill bases with it in air rb
Its removal had nothing to do with ground game modes
4 Likes
Replace “Gaijin” withy “NATO (US) mains” and it will be correct.
1 Like
there is no difference if the youtuber has much more credibility and respect, while the WT players are writing troll comments on the forum
for gaijin CnF would theoretically be easy to handle and fix. but apparently they pay enough money for gaijin to shit on the 90% of remaining players?
even more pathetic, there are tanks like A7V. you literally have enough time to die and spawn cas 3 times over before this tank gets to any enemies. imagine taking 7 minutes to drive to the middle of the map, just to get eaten by a CAS player
you will have CAS trolls watch this video and still unironically say that this use case is “rare” or “unusual” or “unproblematic”.
top tier is such a joke, no way im touching any nation other than russia any time soon. but by saying that, i dont want to give gaijin ideas to add turbo cancer to other nations
Spoiler
Lmao, now playing 7.Xs is ‘sealclubbling low tier’ 😂
You’re only destroying your own credibility by lying about public info such as player records…everyone can see these and see what you said is bogus. You’d best apologize and recant to save face…it’s for the best.
I am an experienced, well-rounded War Thunder player that does alright while playing casually. (You care more about my record than I do (jealousy?)…do me a favor, check out the grass at your place please)
I see you do not understand the issue at all…allow me to try explaining it to you again:
YouTube polls are problematic for a number of reasons, including the fact that you don’t even need to be a WT player to partcipate.
The flaw there should be apparent to you…I would hope.
That is what you took away from that? Jeez…
What I said is that people voting on commentary about WT should have relevant WT experience…such as having played the game (having a YouTube account =/= WT player). Keep in mind, that’s a low bar…that’s just getting into the game, nevermind the mode/vehicle/whatever.
All this means is that you either did not understand how/why poll was vulnerable and/or you’re happy with flawed data as long as it fits your narrative.
Neither of those is a good look.
Let me be direct in asking you this, because this was the main problem I raised earlier:
You don’t see an issue with non-WT players voting in a WT poll on YouTube (or wherever)?
Edit: Embarrassingly, some desperate false flaggers tried to suppress this post…they must really not want people to see all of this.
i would assume a considerable majority of people voting on a youtube poll from a war thunder youtuber have some experience.
and also to be fair, even if these voters dont have direct experience in the game, they would be objectively correct in voting for the “CAS” option in the poll.
but regardless the poll is pointless and doesnt give us any insight into anything, so it doesnt matter.
it comes down to “plane → shoot tank → shit gameplay”, you dont need any poll for that.
1 Like
Yes, that’s a reasonable assumption…and I’d even agree with you about it, it is the likeliest situation.
There are limitations to what it can tell us and lingering questions about exactly how fit it is to tell us what it does; I point these things out as a matter of highlighting data quality. Some people around here don’t seem to care about or recognize why that matters…and they’re embarrassing themselves along the way.
To your credit, you’re not insisting the data is infallible as-is.
Sentiments like this are why I always have some laughs at the top tier elitism often heard:
You’ll see people screeching about how awful balance/CAS/grinding is in top tier and then they’ll ask why you’re not there ‘enjoying’ all of that with them…
Yet you are presenting it as evidence to bolster your argument you are making in here: in the year 2025. Yet, despite the obvious, glaring flaws you admit to, you still lean on it. That is intellectually dishonest and an argumentative fallacy as we both know that the data you are leaning on is not relevant, which you admit yourself.
Anecdotal evidence, no matter the weight one may think it has, it only anecdotal evidence, thus should not be taken as anything other than subjective claims. Ever, no matter the protestations of the claimant.
Your insistence that your anecdotal evidence is more “true” than that of another is intellectually dishonest.
The 2017 data should not have been presented as anything other than a highly questionable observation based on 8 year old data, and in no way representative of anything that occurs today, unless it could be verified as representative of today’s data and the only way anyone can verify any veracity of claims made based on that data is to compare it to current data. Otherwise, it is, until proven otherwise, misinformation. Frankly, it should not have been presented at all as evidence that your argument is a valid one, and I think you know that. Since it cannot be verified as representative of today’s data, it is no better than anyone’s anecdotal evidence about what occurs now.
Frankly, using that data and presenting it as valid is not being “as fair as anyone can really be” as the use of such outdated data would be seen, should be seen, as merely a prop utilized to bolster a view that cannot be validated with current fact. It is there to confirm a bias, that is all.
Entertainingly enough, I wasn’t even the person who first mentioned the 2017 data in this thread…if you think it is biased to even discuss it here, you should consult with the person who broached it, not I.
Taking me a while to get used to this kind of gameplay, but I’ll learn it eventually. At least i can play top tier now and be able Iron Dome like these missiles as well with Japan.
Problem is now there is less CAS being played in top tier lol So won’t get much action yet.
