Same as saying a person having problem in a tank just to use something else ;)
Please tell me why „team” argument only works when You want it to, but to other situations it is „absurd”? For a player in a tank, fighting a Maus with 1.0 vehicle is the same as fighting a plane. If he needs a teamate to help him, what is a difference?
Funny that the while discussion is about being in a tank, preatty amusing You have missed that
It is like You want to discuss AB while only having experience in RB.
No, quite distinct to be honest.
Where are they actually going to fight a maus in a 1.0 vehicle?
That absurdity and want to mock the answer to make it unanswerable isn’t discussion, it’s just you barricading as per usual.
And you don’t have to be in that tank.
It’s like you want to argue whilst gatekeeping as per usual… Typical.
Not really. Both situations present the same
I’m going to make it as simple as I can, because I can see that You really fail to understand.
What is a point in balancing a ground vehicle according to how it performs against other ground vehicles if there might be someone fighting it with a 1.0 plane with a bomb that said vehicle can’t do anything about?
If we make a point that planes are not unbalanced when fighting tanks because someone from a team might spawn SPAA/Plane to fight them, we also have to accept that for example Maus wouldn’t be unbalanced fighting 1.0 tanks because again, someone from a team could spawn a plane and kill it with a bomb.
Preatty simple concept if You are not biased.
The whole discussion is about already being in a tank.
It is like someone going to the doctor saying that they have „x” problem and the only solution would be to say „but You could always do something different!” Instead of helping them.
If wanting people in a discussion to understand basic concepts of what they are talking about and wanting them to provide/show proof of what they are saying is gatekeeping, then sure.
I don’t like wasting my time on fairy tails ;)
Oh get the hell out.
You’re the one making stories pal… Stop baiting.
TO isn’t something Gaijin will add due to how they respond in Q&A related to GRB. But I did share an idea who’m many ignored lol People rather vent and cry out about CAS or behave like karens demanding TO mode instead of actually sharing ideas on how to improve or expand Ground gameplay.
Not talking about nerfs or buffs, but towards mechanics or new features.
Where was the evidence about the 1.0 factually facing a maus?
As per usual, my stats have nothing at all to do with this, and your want to push this is just absolutely mindblowing.
@Forum Moderators This is just well out of hand to have this the go-to with this.
It is a great idea and I don’t think that people missed it because they don’t care about it.
The thing is all this things could be added changed while also having a TO, like battlefield had servers where You couldn’t play ground/air units but only army.
With what You propose, I would go even further. The AA/AT should be placed on capture points and be controlled by AI or a player from a team that have capped it. It would help the gameplay when it comes to playing the objective
Alternatively, decrease the SP reward for assists.
argument is valid, i am not located inside a paper bag where chips are down, nor do i ODL (but ODL due to CAS is justified and i respect it)
i am pretty much “the fence less”, i cant do anything to defend my tank against CAS (except dying and spawning SPAA which is known for its riveting gameplay)
CAS player finds it unfathomable that a tank player wants to play a tank in a tank gamemode against other tanks in tank pvp without having the tank be killed by an unpreventable airstrike
genuinely delusional, clueless
your “points” have been beyond debunked 100 times in this thread
when i happen to be in a tank, yeah its my only option until i die.
i cant shoot a plane from a tank
relying solely on a teammate is shit gameplay
SPAA itself is shit gameplay (depending on who and when you ask)
yeah pretty much, people dont want to put up with CAS bullshit because its simply shit gameplay, very simple
there is discussion, which is always interrupted by CAS supporters who flood the thread with meaningless words trying to dispel attempts to get a TO gamemode.
not a single opposer of TO ever made a valid point, yet it keeps getting repeated forever
your arguments are pure bad faith but ok
funny thing is that i want to play a tank occasionally. pretty simple concept of the game that i apparently play
your opinion is invalid, every point is invalid, its been said to be obviously invalid for as long as this discission is happening.
you just want free targets for your CAS
nobody wants to do that every game, its not fun to play
and change is illegal and physically impossible, any update to the GRB gamemode (including the addition of any other gamemode) will cause the universe to implode.
this is true and has been a verified fact for a long time.
what do you not understand about wanting to play fucking tanks?
your CAS player mentality is completely absurd and cannot be defended
youre the one making stories
there is no such thing as improving GRB as long as aircraft exist.
its not possible to have balanced gameplay when you have tanks vs aircraft
Nonsense.
They’ve alreday made a number of changes to make it better for you, but you’re obviously too hooked up on being defeated that you are only wanting your one precious solution which isn’t coming.
Then you must enjoy dying and complaining about dying then…
What?
Can you name a few? Not trying to sound rude, But from what i remember the changes that are good for tankers are spawn distance for cas. (sense strike drones were spawning directly above the battlefield and cas was spawning inside top tier spaa range.) and a negligible aircraft sp increase for loadouts when the airstrike mod exists.
Lol funny how you be the one who says something like this, when you are the only person in here who has more deaths than kills like you play the game to score as many deaths as possible?
Why are you jumping on board this dog pile for no reason? He’s been specifically complaining that there’s NOTHING to counter the planes as per every argument ever to ignore SPAA and any other method just to keep complaining…
Spawn distance for CAS, and the intelligence changes. (I forgot about the new SPAA with datalink style)
Funny how the only ones who complain complain about dying in a game where the give or take is to kill or be killed, but yet they proclaim that them dying is a given no matter what the advice or methods are to avoid that almost as if they sit in the open, praying to be bombed…
Awkward moment when pangolin fans has better kill death ratio than you. lmao you should have used words suited to your status bro
Anyway, nobody complaint about dying to things their vehicle can counter, they don’t like dying to things their vehicle cannot counter, is it that hard to understand you dunderheaded?
What is with you guys all trying to insult me and shame me into submission…
Ahhh and the old insults… Pretty lame if you ask me because it shows you can’t discuss anything, and you are unable to form an argument of your own considering this is on the back of all the rest of the crew who do bait and be twits about everyone disagreeing with them.
The issue here is that they ARE counterable, and your reliance on spreading the word that they’re not is just incorrect, and outright wrong.
Hell, they even added a fresh new SPAA and look at you guys all still moaning.
Sadly I can’t turn my tank into them
I actually think it’s about time @Pacifica or @Stona_WT tended to this as there’s absolutely no way I’m the ‘reason’ for this hatred and misguided ‘attack everyone who doesn’t agree with us’ stupidity.
The sheer idiocy by this mere statement to continue to ignore that SPAA is available. Just ridiculous.
The discussion is about being in a tank first, so yes, can’t turn my tank into SPAA
Don’t write something stupid so you don’t need to tag them in to clean up the mess you left. You’ve gone for like a month, why bother coming back to flood the forum with useless responses?