Canadian Sub-tree for USA

We Brits don’t have AIM-7F on our F-4J(UK) even though it is an F-4J from the USN because we didn’t bought ‘inferior’ one compared to our Skyflash

And, our Sea Hawk isn’t armed with AIM-9B either, even though Exported variant of both Western Germany and Netherland one has 9B

So it makes sense that you guys are never gonna get RCAF CL-13 Mk. 6 with 9B even if Gaijin let you guys steal it.

Their standards are not firm.

But well… if we think about ‘that’ F-5C which is equipped with Taiwanese countermeasure pods due to ‘technically comparbility’, you guys maybe has chance to get 9B on CL-13 Mk.6 though.

Because you guys are different.

1 Like

not seeing any canadians in this chat wanting to be a 51st state subtree. Seeing a lot of yanks that think they are a 51st state tho.

Gaijin really needs to just carve up a map and say “X goes Y, now shut the f up”

5 Likes

we have SRAAM on a gr1 harrier and hunter for that reason. its done a lot.

oh and the premium AV8s at 9.7 in the US and jpn trees have a CM pod from “technical compatibility” too. meanwhile the GR1 isnt allowed a CM box despite being the same level of technically yes but really no

1 Like

I highly doubt the average Canadian cares and with how much smaller of a population you got it wouldn’t hurt Gaijin in any way even if Canadian players did leave.
And like everyone else who says “that’s it im leaving for real this time!” we all know you will be back in a week.

1 Like

What I meant was

When there is equipment that nation A didn’t equip in Vehicle A
But nation B used it.

Nation A almost always gets that equipment on Arsenal because ‘technically it can, because Nation B proved’

PGM on Tonka GR.1 would be our few example.

1 Like

most of the people that say that have more than likely already spent money on the game anyways

Considering every time Canada in the US was brought up and hit with Canadian’s piling on with hard nos before current events, it is only that much more now.

Canada, not being part of the US, is a founding part of the nation’s identity. It’s why the support ideas are: UK sub-tree, CAN-ANZAC tree, pure Canadian tree.

2 Likes

There has been loads of suggestions for that but they never get any attention from Gaijin.
This is an old one but still a good example of whats been proposed before.


Ignore Ukraine/Russia being paired, This was originally made before the current conflict and before Israel was a tree.

All the Canada rn being mad at the USA xD

4 Likes

the average canadians national identity is majorly based upon not being part of the united states so thats quite culturally insensitive to say.

gaijin LOVES money, they are less likley to do something that hurts revenue streams even if they are more niche, they still update naval after all,

saw quite a few singers leave when gaijin said they were going to put them with china so while some will whine and keep playing, plenty will still leave.

keep them happy (so away from you americans) and they will usually spend more.

405

2 Likes

im actually a big fan of that very nation idea. its near perfection in my opinion but i think spain is better with italy instead of germany

1 Like

or brimstone 1 on german and italian typhoons. or on the gripen E for some stupid ass reason

Whoa, I think that move is blunder

In that theory
Gaijn might highly doubt the average westerner cares and how much smaller of a poplulation we got.
It wouldn’t hurt Gaijin in any way, even if NATO players leave.

Look at Kh38.

I genuinely think that you just shot your own foot.

2 Likes

Guess they need to start pandering to individual states now lol

They where willing to continue their plan to give the Chinese tree an Abrams despite the outcry it caused.
Clearly they are fine with controversial additions like that even if it makes people angry.

no, adding abram was part of taiwan sub tree that it.

1 Like

That’s only a take if you poll them but then again the average on both sides would think to themselves if they look at this thread and go “Why would a bunch of adults care enough to argue about what pixels goes where for”

2 Likes

I mean if Taiwan is going to be with the PRC china it makes sense for their Abrams to be there.

A large amount of the anger was because of the extremely racist uproar from chinese players over a chinese tank possibly going in the japan tree, despite their tree having zero 100% native designs within it.

It showed a double standard as gaijin bends the knee to china but not other nations concerns anywhere near as easy

2 Likes

Hell yeah!

6 Likes

That ones not true.
I do suuport the nations that use leopards.
I was the first to co gratulate hu gary to the 2a7hu in their thread.

What we are against is UK specIaly getting a 3rd subtree and gathering the specialties of other countries like pokemon.
You already got south africa and india.
India is a beast for air additions if gajin would finaly add them.
But you csnt have freaking everything.
Cause of that uk should not get canadian leos.
They dont need them