Canadian Sub-tree for USA

I’m not bothered, I’m damn annoyed that every country claim our vehicles as the only option for them…

The Canadair Sabre Mk. 6 carried 9Bs

NATO countries allowing you to purchase and use equipment. It also helped serve as a defense force so Canada never really had to fill a major gap in military assistance, as they could always rely on the US and GB and France if it really came to it. It’s still somewhat like that.

On a side note so no one makes the accusations here. To be clear; Canada is, and should be, an independent nation in the real world. I do not view it as a 51st state or some stupid thing like that.

1 Like

It is different compared to the current status of Canada.

You guys can form a deck in the name of ‘United States Army’
But fancy Canadians cannot form a deck as RCAF/CAF.

I think you guys enjoy understatement even more than I do.

3 Likes

I mean, making your nation the standard equipment for the allies does that.

As for the LAVs, thankfully, bar the LAV-I, which uses a British turret, most models are used by more than 1 Commonwealth nation. Which is a far better claim than half the budget being military.

1 Like

They also imported things from said allies, Yet don’t have any of it.
They built the turrets and parts for over a thousand Churchils, Including buying several compleat ones, Yet don’t have them.
80+ Fireflies, Again no where to be seen.
12 Centurions from Australia.
Just about every soviet era medium tank, Purchased or siezed in large numbers from the former allies of the soviets and used for training to this day.
They use the Rapier on several air bases.

Why you talk about the only damn vehicle we didn’t built

I guess we are making up RACF equipment now? Not all Canadair Sabre Mk 6s carried 9Bs; only the exported ones.

We can talk about Grizzly or valentines

Oh god this cesspit again

I mean yeah kinda. Just like the Thai or Malaysian or whatever Su-30 with KH-38MTs and stuff. Gaijin has shown that as long as an aircraft did use them, it is welcome to the vehicle whether or not it was in that nations arsenal. To be very fair.

The forever war

Forever war because the US can’t be told no for once

3 Likes

Eh, I mean if they add Canada in the US tree I don’t really loose, I will just delete the game and play hell let loose

They add Canada soon

But gaijin wouldn’t make a political choice like this

2 Likes

But they’ve equally shown that they are willing to not give something even if others used it.

Much much less as of recently. When’s the most recent time that occured?

I’m just saying it’s a stupid argument, as Gaijin doesn’t exactly have a strong and well lined reasoning to not give a “Canadian” Mk. 6 9Bs

Thing is the US don’t need the Canadians in their MAIN tree like the Skink only reason was due to gaijins habit of “We made this model so it better earn it’s pay”. Look at the Mossies for that example even though it would be cool if the Israelis got theirs too cough cough.

image

image

2 Likes

Yeah, USA never used the skink and even refused the project

It’s a joke that they have it for a “realistic game”

3 Likes

i would just go back to enjoy my roblox tbh, god i miss when i played 10h a day in covid

3 Likes

Canada in the US tree mean that an enormous part of Canadian would leave the game and it mean less money

1 Like

A 70 mph run with the City’s you say : D