Its your luck.
UK can get another challenger 3 version already again
And there is the challenger 130 they could add to uk and germany
Multiple smaller less known challengers as well
More challenger 2es for mobility as example with better sights
Its not that Uk already lacks options.
Its that u didnt inform yourself
You didn’t, but I had a discussion with a German main wanting the Canadian Leo when it was leaked
Eh, i guess there is all kinds of people.
I already had canadians come up to me and tell me they dont mind canada being split either.
Canadian skin for a leo 2a6 would make sense(not necesarily for germany)
Besides that its implementation ehh.
On one hand some players are happy if thwir vehicles get added at all, on the others they dislile being split or being put as a subtree in a specific country.
Now the question is would the same players that dislike being split/subtree prefer their vehicles not getting added at all?
I thought the big thing about the M1A2T was less about it going to China and more about the fact the Thai VT-4 wasn’t added
Depends who you ask.
The US mainly complains abiut them getting an abrams.
Everyone else more that japan didnt get the vt 4
Turkey, USA in one “TT” gee I wonder from which country the author is from.
Well, M60 AMBT | War Thunder Wiki.
Considering this was made before Israel was even added too (which is why they are also in the USA coalition group).
Yeah don’t forget Poland as well
I prefer not be in the game than being split everywhere with cash grabs vehicles
You joking right?
You don’t use the two Rams in 5.3 with the Ram AT and the skink
For the two leo, not everyone is rich lol, same for eh CF-188
For the ships…60% of them are rare vehicles and not in the same br
And for the vehicles in the US I wouldn’t touch that with my feets
You can make a realistic Canadian 5.3-5.7 line-up with Ram tanks, spitfires, RCAF Lancaster and firefly VC.
One of them is rare yes, which is the 4.3/4.7 one that fits nice with the Terra Nova. And there’s some British ships too that are of similar model as some HCMS.
2.3 Canadian line-up is also very decent with a flower class, an MBT-460 and you could technically supplement it with a Vosper too iirc.
But yeah, for ground lineups, outside of the 5.3 one, you’re screwed. I have all Canadian vehicles in the UK tech tree, except for the CF-188.
The ones in Germany and USA I only have the low BR ones from way back when.
note: Don’t forget the Mustang Mk.IA, which has some amazing RCAF skins!
With the Ram II in the UK, you can sort of make a 3.7 with the Churchill III. (I guess the same can be said with US 3.7, but the UK can be a bit better-rounded of a line-up)
I really want the Lancaster skin(even if it’s based on the post-war ASW variant Canada made, so only semi-historical), and need to get the Mustang for its skins at some point.
Ya, Naval is likely best for Canadian line-ups, Haida and Terra Nova or the number of lower BR coastal stuff.
Overall, bar one exception(that I brought up), you can only make Canadian decks in the UK, unlike the US and Germany, where you’d have to run poor/single vehicle decks.
RIIIIIGHT, A Ram 1 (3.0) with a 40mm and a Ram 2 (3.7) with a 57 mm against tigers and Panthers
That sounds sooooooo fun
I won’t use them with my skink and AT Ram
Better than my Danish lineup
10.7 F-35 (DOA for ground)
9.7 CV9035
3.7 M24
2.0 Lynx (close enough to the model that was to be sent to us)
Also the Ram 1 is so hit or miss for me, some days its great then other times i struggle to pen a Panzer
Canada is Canadian and we shouldn’t be in the American tree…
I don’t even understand why this post is not political but when we speak about the vt5 in Japan all of those post get deleted it’s the same
Two countries who don’t like eachother
lmfao
Welcome to india! we got:
hunter but worse
Jaguar but still mid
Delta thats mid
@Macron-Spokesman worst nightmare (a rafale in the brit tree)
another underperforming harrier
F-16XL but worse
potential KH-38 slinger
Gnat but on protein shakes
crappy russian APC
crappy russian APC upgraded
crappy russian MBT
The worst MBT of the 21st century
There are two potential metas there, neither are wanted by british mains and the rest are DOAs none of which fill gaps in the British tree
ZA also doesnt fill gaps in the british tree, it filled the light tank void for a few years but its not like we never had native additions to fill it.
Canada however:
Culturally, historically and military doctrinally inseparable from the UK. Proudly NOT AMERICAN as of 1534 and proudly British from 1763, and as of 1931 a main British Commonwealth member. We even still share a King and a crown.
also, THE WAR OF 1812 for christs sake.
the CF-188 and aussie hornets filled a major gap in high tier british air. the Ram 1 and 2 filled a great heavy medium role in the ground tree.
Canadair F-5s would give a mid tier meta vehicle to britain (only because the F-5 is overperforming in FM and undertiered to hell
CL-13s can be alongside the RAF sabres (where tf are they gaijin) as either a deserving skin or premium offering (i love sea vixen but its too niche for the masses)
CF-104 is the closest thing we will get to a functional lightning
the LAV family will fill the IFV void from warrior to boxer CRV very well (no the lav isnt american)
Germany and America need them far far less.
Minor nations are to go where they are a fitting supplimentary. Canada and the rest of the main anglosphere (Australia and New zealand) fit best with britain, and would be a better supplimentary group of vehicles there instead of being lost in the mush of two already bloated nations.
im not a leopard fan but i cant deny that it would boost the competitive side of the british tree, challenger cant catch a break often
🇨🇦
Oi, don’t forget Quebec
But uhhhh…we still want to be alone in a tree ☝️😶
We already fight here for not being in the US, now the British join the fight too
