That would be nowhere near balanced.
How hard the russian mains cryed, jesus. Then we need the DM73, the DM63, M829A3 or even the M829A4, the Anti-era tips… .
seeing that it has no armor gun handling of t80b i would say its ballanced
and no thermo
That’s the way to counter 2A7V and 122B+? 💀
We dont need another 3 years of russian point and click adventures.
Let see how much bugged his damage model come to the game, and how effective these blocks at the turret are
Good to see the USSR tech tree getting some more vehicles. Glad Gaijin is putting such a strong emphasis on improving the options for minor nations
Another tank to put Ukrainian flag on
Absolutely not
Cool tank but wasn’t needed imo
Good to see in game, but priorities are way out of wack and we should be using events to help pad out lineups for nations with weak options or limited choices.
Minor nation not having a lot of event is way better lmo , we will have a better tech tree . I often take this exemple but for exemple France only get 1/3 EBR when the 2 over two are event/battlepass vehicle
While i agree, locking vehicles behind event for nations that have weak or limited choices isnt exactly a good solution either.
Aye, its not perfect of course, but i’d rather that then have USSR gaining even more vehicles in their TT.
They’re literally running out of screen space
It would still be balanced if it could; since every MBT could pen it back in exchange as well.
It is, basically, a true glass canon!
I do not agree with you at all. For me event vehicle shouldn’t be really important vehicle, but funny vehicle that are plus on a linup . For me this or the losat are perfect addition .
If they lock vehicle behind events New players won’t have the chance to play important vehicle
I wonder how much the US and Germany cried when they got the mbt70 with the 152mm cannon? (Since that’s the only parameter of the tank???).
did you have any source about 140mm tank gun of MBT Fap or other nation project like M1 CATTB of US or Germany/UK?