It just isn’t cluttered with crap like little rocks and someone’s laundry. The generic procedurally generated terrain on the airmaps will be much easier on client and server hardware than the artsy ground maps. The pretty detailed maps are nice, but we don’t play the game to virtually sight see.
Yes, more like EC and WW mode where you are fighting large scale battles with hundreds of units instead of just a dozen.
I would be the first to play 1 hour games. I been playing from long ago and every time I thinked “what if in reality this game become more a simulator than a tanksCOD?”. Not everyone like the hardcore sims but i do, and for me? coming home after a long day of work log in and playing a good match with strategy caring about my teammaetes and on a big*ss map is the better thing Gaijin can do after the 2A7V and DU Abrams fiasco. So yes I prefeer 2 matchs of 1 hour per day, than more or less 45 matches of 3-5 minutes and 3-5 matches of at best 10 minutes per day because in these 40 matches I feel nothing, no one care about his teammate, everyone going “YOLO”, everyone dying and leaving at the second minute of match… . This game is a COD but with tanks… and other vehicles who in top tier just make the situation worse… . I pray for Gaijin adding a proper “simulator mode” in the game for those who love REAL sims experiences. (And nothing to say about tank interiors, it could be extremely good if they add it )
Some prefer to have nicer graphics while they play the game, i get what you mean but I’m having difficulty seeing how it can be executed without one of the cons.
That´s what im talking about, even gaijin sells the game as a “Simulator” but in reality it has little as a simulator… They can add this new “HardSim” mode as a new game mode to the game. Yea some times i just want to play few matchs to get the squadron points and leave because im tired or something, so no, deleting the GRB is not an option at all
Not about who prefers arcade, it’s about who does NOT prefer simulators: which is about 99% of people. A more extreme simulator would be NOT preferred, presumably, by like 99.5% of people. So it’d be a pretty bizarre investment.
I dunno, I mean it doesn’t exist and is just a hypothetical, so you kinda have to just describe it the way the person who gave the hypothetical described it to reply to it