Why? It is just good nothing else
great, just another russian bias vehicle
can we finally have an update where russia doesnt get anything on toptier because THEY DONT DESERVE IT? they already had pantsir that was ridiculously op and got kh38 which doesnt even exist AND IT GOT BUFFED TOO and now they must get another op SPAA?
1 Like
USSR having a good vehicle = blatant bias for some people
4 Likes
they do lack a proper top tier fighter (su35) which should have been added with rafale/eft
1 Like
Well, in a good way, yes, instead of planes, AA and other things, the Soviets need a new tank that meets NATO standards.
1 Like
Crew safety and reverse speed?
armata only one that can meet that standard currently?
T-84 Yatagan maybe if gaijin decides if the all former USSR members are a considered a subtree for the USSR
Meanwhile everything except the Iowa is better…? Bro stop speaking on things you don’t know.
1 Like
There is no way you seriously still think soyuz isnt the best, if its sooo bad why are top tier naval battles soyuz vs soyuz only now
1 Like
I’ve seen plenty of the yamatos and the like.
It all depends on who’s playing what, week by week it could all be yamatos, or Iowas, etc.
At least the Iowa existed.
1 Like
Idk in my experience playing the soyuz, which I haven’t played much because it’s just straight up boring, the only boat that can even think about really doing anything to me is the Iowa and the Soyuz is still leagues above it. Yamato is a snack and the Bismarck isn’t anything to worry about. The Italian boat can cause some damage due to pen but it also gets wiped, the Soyuz is just broken I only use it in customs at this point
No, just Soyuz players and AI bots are left at top tier Naval. All others gave up.
I tried to play it to grind the naval event, but quickly realized its better to play other BR brackets. Only some Soyuz players left, that BR bracket is pretty much deserted.
Dog, it wasn’t completed, but it still existed. Pretty much every naval nation in game has a non completed or “fake vehicle” as I’m sure you’re about to say. The USA is no exception.
1 Like
Nobody plays top tier because it take f’k 30 mins to find a game.
Stop spreading disinformation, plenty of people play naval, you are quite literally being vastly dishonest at this point.
The most common ship I’ve seen has been the Iowa, and Yamato, the least common the Bismarck.
1 Like
Wrong, every single ship in the US tree was actually constructed and was in service
lol oh okay “wrong” mentality XD oh brother…
Also, you’d rather they don’t add the Montana? I’d love to see the Montana, but since you insist non completed ships shouldn’t be added, clearly the USA cannot get that.
(It didn’t even leave the design stage btw)
Show me a single US ship that has actually already been added that never entered active service please
Ill make this easy, you can’t
Same applies to the British and french trees too, thats pretty much half of the trees that dont
Issue is other narions need to prove it Russia doesn’t.
We have no proof excluding 3rd party sources that comfirn this seeker head was ever installed on BUKs missile.
Brochures recent ones do not offer the BUK 3M with
An ARHM seeker. Russia have all but phased out BUK with dwindling orders for BUK 3M. Favouring superior systems like the S-350.
its more that both sampt and camm look gimped to say the least