They are adding SAMP/T as well so it still have some competition I guess. Also iris isn’t bad as well
Y’all gotta see this missile performance in the dev server
https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/s/epnRpOL5ey
I thought the Sovetsky Soyuz was the pinnacle of bias in WT. But BUK proves me wrong. It the most serious example of bias. I’ll avoid top tier GRB when this thing goes live.
2 Likes
2 Likes
SRAAM in Vtol be like
1 Like
thats where im skeptical cause the source on said tvc i cant find. i have found a picture but i cant really tell if what im looking at might be a jet vane mechanism.
afaik thats not a buk, i think at the time it was reported as a kub.
now that multipathing is insanely strong and notching easy as fuck. not when they fix that which im pretty sure is going to happen this patch as every sam is ARH.
when that happens you’ll have 9k317ma a modernization of a soviet design, be better than aster 30 in every way.
its pathetic really, Samp-t is limited by the radar, not the missile, aster 30 should outrange the radar.
Easily in my top 10 favourite military videos ever because what are the odds.
ohhh these are some nice pics
1 Like
is the 9m317m the first russian missile to use jet vanes?
It is the first of the Buks. Overall, idk.
i dont think so
2 s300 and 1 s400 missiles right? im pretty sure the only one preceding the 9m137m is the 48n6 tho
im not sure i think the s400 variant entered service in early 2010s. iirc shtil-1 (VLS) entered service in 2012. but if u include buk m3 then it entered service in mid to late 2010s. i think both 48n6 and 48n6D entered service in the 90s. (iirc 46n6dm is 48n6e3). i think even 9M82 and 9M83 (used by s300) have jet vanes.
interesting stuff. besides, does anybody know how many g’s the buk can sustain in dev rn? cause ive seen some impressive stuff, like better than r73.