What I mean is that literally every NATO plane has enough weapons to cover the whole of Vietnam.
why is a 2001 su30 , 90s F15/16 facing european jets from mid-late 2010s ?
SU30SM entered service in 2012.
its a copy paste su30mki which is from 2001 (same radar , rwr , engines )
Its not, its Su30sm that has entered the service with better RWR,Radar and engines.
1 Like
no lmao ? su-30mki and su30sm uses the same AL-31FP , L-150 rwr (earlier su30mki , they changed the rwr on later versions) , both use N011m bars radar.
it does appear to have TVC nozzles , so i think it uses tvc irl.
It does you are correct, althougn it is a huge missile so it wont pull as much G as it’s counterparts…Well in the real world anyway…
in game its pulling around 30-35 Gs max i haven’t seen how much aster 30 n camm-er pull in game but their stat card says 50Gs. they are probably much more maneuverable.
2 Likes
As long as the US gets the 160km PAC-2, lets go for it.
1 Like
?
At one BR you should have vehicles with same performances, date of introduction means nothing here.
If they perform the same, yes.
Doesn’t matter if vehicles are from 1960s or 2010s.
1 Like
Pantsir can’t hold a candle to SLM nor is a viable AA against anyone that knows how to break LoS.
3 Likes
still very strong to the point of making anything that isnt a kh38 slinger be in constant danger to fire ordinance
2 Likes
It’s stats paint a pretty different picture.
skill issue =/= true capability
1 Like
Your opinion =/= true capability
right back at ye
Call me back when you have a real argument.
Claiming Pantsir is suddenly bad now is insanity.
I would agree with you but a good Pantsir player is more dangerous than an IRIS-T
3 Likes