What I mean is that literally every NATO plane has enough weapons to cover the whole of Vietnam.
why is a 2001 su30 , 90s F15/16 facing european jets from mid-late 2010s ?
SU30SM entered service in 2012.
its a copy paste su30mki which is from 2001 (same radar , rwr , engines )
Its not, its Su30sm that has entered the service with better RWR,Radar and engines.
1 Like
no lmao ? su-30mki and su30sm uses the same AL-31FP , L-150 rwr (earlier su30mki , they changed the rwr on later versions) , both use N011m bars radar.
it does appear to have TVC nozzles , so i think it uses tvc irl.
It does you are correct, althougn it is a huge missile so it wont pull as much G as it’s counterparts…Well in the real world anyway…
in game its pulling around 30-35 Gs max i haven’t seen how much aster 30 n camm-er pull in game but their stat card says 50Gs. they are probably much more maneuverable.
1 Like
As long as the US gets the 160km PAC-2, lets go for it.
1 Like
?
At one BR you should have vehicles with same performances, date of introduction means nothing here.
If they perform the same, yes.
Doesn’t matter if vehicles are from 1960s or 2010s.
Pantsir can’t hold a candle to SLM nor is a viable AA against anyone that knows how to break LoS.
2 Likes
still very strong to the point of making anything that isnt a kh38 slinger be in constant danger to fire ordinance
1 Like
It’s stats paint a pretty different picture.
skill issue =/= true capability
Your opinion =/= true capability
right back at ye
Call me back when you have a real argument.
Claiming Pantsir is suddenly bad now is insanity.
I would agree with you but a good Pantsir player is more dangerous than an IRIS-T
2 Likes