Your opinion =/= true capability
right back at ye
Call me back when you have a real argument.
Claiming Pantsir is suddenly bad now is insanity.
I would agree with you but a good Pantsir player is more dangerous than an IRIS-T
2 Likes
the range of the iris t and baby mode ease to use compensates for the trash players. just as an ADATS will always be a scary thing to face even tho america mains are using it
Suddenly - no, but in 2 years the developers made it 2 times worse.
Lol, sure let’s give Russia 2016 BVM and 2017 T90M but NATO must be stuck with 1980 tanks.
What 1980s tanks are at top tier? And if they are equal in performance, what’s the big issue?
2 Likes
So Russia should get latest equipment but due to bein superior NATO should not?
Well then in this case lets remove KH38 family alongside with KA52 and MI28NM since these helicopters and A2G missile systems doesnt have equal on nato part.
If Russia can recieve latest or even prototype vehicles so does NATO can.
If they have equal performance I don’t see where’s the issue. This game has BR for balancing, thus your fixation on date of introduction is weird.
You basically want to see a vehicle, for example, made in 1990 higher in BR than a vehicle made in 1980, just because it’s newer.
Makes no sense.
So you want superior vehicles at the same BR, that’s quite funny when you think about it.
Who said they couldn’t if their performance fits into the game.
I believe CR3 TD we have in game is just a few years old IRL.
1 Like
That “suddenly” happened in late 2024 when UFOs came.
Thanks for sharing your opinion, it’s definitely helpful.
I do because unlike you I would to see equal chances, not arbitrary advantages for Russia.
Imagine T90M faces leopard2A4 where it holds almost every advantages except mobility and gun depression
Sound fair to you? It’s not.
[quote=“MotorolaCRO, post:274, topic:263067”]
So you want superior vehicles at the same BR, that’s quite funny when you think about it.
Considering you wanna see 1980 model Abrams and leopards to face BVM and 90M I’d say it’s not as fun as your logic.
Not gonna even talk about KH38 spammers and Russian helis.
Which is prototype that worse than regular chally 2 due to lacking turret armor and spall liners.
You’re quite funny today I must say.
It is 6 years old as of now.
1 Like
As a result, we will have nothing left of the helicopters at all, since the USSR has no analogues to NATO helicopters, and NATO has no analogues to Soviet helicopters.
I don’t see how T-90M has more chances to succeed than something like uparmored Leopards or M1s.
Luckily 2A4 is more than a full BR step below.
Again, date of introduction isn’t the same as performance.
Until you figure this out I doubt we can speak about any of this as you’re not understanding the most basic of things.
Still very new and very prototype.
Stop making up excuses for your new tanks.
1 Like
Okay, 2019 isn’t old and if we use his logic this 2019 vehicle fighting M1s from 1990s or 2000s is unfair, as it’s much newer and thus “better”.
This all date of introduction talk is nonsense.
1 Like
And you can stop making excuses for Russian Tanks.
Enough said.