If i remember correctly, they didn’t give brit phantoms 9L’s because they would see a br increase?
Would it be a good idea to give the FG1 the 9Ls even if it meant a small BR increase and keep the FGR2 as is. So now you get to choose between carrier spawns with 9Ls at the cost of the slightly increased BR. Or the current phantom loadouts.
It would also add abit more variety to both the phantoms in the british TT.
Until decompression, I still dont understand why its BR would increase at all, but essentially yes and that is what people want them to do. Try it, give 1 of them 9Ls, see what happens.
FGR2 instead of 9Ls could also get AGM-12s. They could make the 2 aircraft unique.
Did the FG.1s ever carry AIM-9Ls though?
I thought it was only the FGR.2s that carried them
Because they are in the British tree and GJN hates the UK.
Kurnass 2000 gets six missiles that are even better than 9Ls at the same BR along with a better choice of A2G weaponry. So the UK phantoms get much worse IR missiles for the sale of being able to carry four of the worst “top tier” SARHs in the game.
The FG.1 has a gunpod it never used… While in the Royal Navy. It was given to the RAF where it received the gunpod and later the Skyflash (I think) and definitely AIM-9L’s.
Ahh ok, thx
Yes, all the FG.1 when transfered to the RAF were converted to the FGR.2 standard.
But did it use the SF while in the RN or was it just too late?
I think Skyflash came into service around the same time that the Royal Navy retired the carriers, so Skyflash was likely an RAF thing for the FG.1.
There must have been some overlap as the FG.1 was retired on the 27th of November 1978 and the SF was put into service in 1978. I think it’s more likely it was procured earlier in the year. So probably only 4 months at most before they were given to the RAF.
Were the FG.1’s redesignated to FGR.2’s or did they keep the naval name?
If they were changed to the FGR.2 designation then in game you probably can’t get the aim-9l’s on the FG.1
We also really need more maps with carriers to spawn on, its fun to take off from them in an actual game :D
The FG1 kept its designation. There was still multiple differences between the FG1 and FGR2.
So, in my opinion, the only thing keeping the British phantoms from having Aim-9L’s is purely balance related, if they get L’s they will most likely go up in br and will be terrible, i think right now they are in a good spot, clearly better than the tornado in my experience and the IR missiles they have now are more than enough to get kills with :)
Maybe 11.7 with 9L’s will be fine.
I still don’t see why a hardwing phantom with no HMS and a gunpod needs to go up just because it gets 9L’s.
Like the MLA is infinitely better to fly, faster, has better flight performance in all regimes but acceleration at low speed, whilst having 2 much more reliable SARH’s and 4 all aspect missiles. And they expect us to believe that the FG phantoms getting 9L’s would warrant them going up to 11.7, the same br as the F-14…
I dont think it should go up, I just know gaijin would put it up.
Cause Gaijin considered Aim-9L’s to be a massive upgrade for fighters.
They’ve literally stated giving it 9L’s would require a BR increase.
Man, you must have every book possible to do with UK military vehicles
Need to start your own thread, just for a book club :P
