Yeah, but there are… A LOT of Phantoms. They would have made a model not for just one, but for a dozen and a half. I mean literally. We have 15 Phantoms.
Yeah, its one of those classic cases of gaijin acting without thinking and then rather than admitting they made a mistake, they just deflect and hide behind some lame excuse
Aside from you wouldn’t actually have to model them for more than 1. Because “if it’s technically compatible”.
Would not be the first time this excuse was used, except this time it would be helpful.
1 Like
Also it’s not like the slight difference in drag between the McDonnell (Early)[1960 though ~1974] and Sargent Fletcher (Late)[Cut-in with beginning of F-4J/N production, circa ~'64] 370 Gallon wing tanks and their mounting brackets would attract that much attention. Or the rare alternate source Royal Jet tank
See the odd looking external tank on the left(foreground) wing station.
It’s like how the USN F-4’s and their derived variants were implemented initially reusing the USAF variant of inboard wing rack, instead of the LAU-17 they should have had until it was later corrected.
Also the Sargent Fletcher tanks are shared with a numerous others US airframes so many would benefit from their inclusion. It may also already be modeled on others like the F-100D in game but I’d have to check which variant of the tank they have acess to.
Speaking of “one aircraft - one type of drop tank”
1 Like
you forgot most of the F-16s in the game
and Tornado F.3(Late)
and MiG-29SMT (or atleast it used to have 2 types of tanks)
it dosent, it should tho,
like the 29G
MiG-29SMT used to have a larger belly tank, and a smaller belly tank (Standard MiG-29 tank)
did they remove the standard MiG-29 tank from it?
We’d need someone with it to check as not everything is always in presets
that sounds like the initial copy paste that gaijin always does on the dev server
bc i dont remember ever seeing the standard Mig-29 tank on the SMT
I have a question. It is known that the PGM2000 and PGM500 now have man-in-the-loop functionality, but the Tornado GR.1 and Tornado GR.4 do not support man-in-the-loop due to airframe limitations, so the PGM2000 and PGM500 on these two aircraft do not have man-in-the-loop capability. So here’s the question: will the increased spawn point cost for man-in-the-loop missiles this time affect these two Tornado variants?
Probably lol, unless the increase is done via keyword then maybe not. who knows.
Stormer is broken again missiles barely follow the cursor…terrible
It actually didn’t get more costly. I flew the Tornado GR.1 today with four PGM500 loaded, and the spawn point cost stayed exactly the same as before the update. The spawn point increase only applies to ordnance that has man-in-the-loop functionality, so these two Tornado variants without that feature aren’t affected at all.
1 Like
Had the video pop up but didn’t click on it, seen Leo chassis and assumed it was German, British?
Looks like the gun from the CV90120?
The gun is the 140mm Ascalon of the french
1 Like
my favourite British weapon system
man that is ugly