British Weapon Systems - Technical data and discussion

WE NEED THE CLIMB TO BE BETTER
The climb as of right now is too shallow
image

Would certainly explain the loft, then.

How do I use ALARM?!?
Consult the instructions.
image

6 Likes

tbf thats abit more than 35 degrees…

1 Like

Instructions unclear, MEZ not explained
AI did not help
image

1 Like

image

1 Like

But I don’t want to marry a missile?

7 Likes

I must admit they are quite fun

I launched them at 40km at an ADATS and you can just watch them slowly fly over and orbital strike him from like 10km up

The range is kind of absurd if you fire from altitude

1 Like

No choice, shotgun marriage.

4 Likes

but current trajectory planning Cause the missile to frequently lose its target, or fly over it before diving… Diving too late, resulting in failure to even hit stationary targets.

Hmm, maybe, but you cant be sure.
Im going to launch my ALARM outside Central European Time, just to be safe.

1 Like

Sure, best to be safe.

1 Like


yup

1 Like

I just have a feeling, that if we forced the current ALARM to do vertical climb right now, it would fail to sustain itself.

image

The current problem is caused by gaijin cutting out this crucial part
…again

2 Likes

We have DIRECT mode now.

3 Likes

Seemed to do a 45km shot pretty easily when fired at 5km alt and mach 1

My only gripe is they they don’t come perfectly from above, if they did they’d be a lot harder to intercept, they’re still pretty hilarious tho

edit:

Just did a 55km shot no problem lmao

1 Like

That’s correct; its current guidance head may lose lock due to the tracking rate being unable to keep up with the excessively high climb rate… This has actually happened many times in my tests, and since the iog is not working, it will fly straight upward like an unguided rocket, continuing to climb.

Some shots are better than others, I’ve had some nice top downs.

Could do with a dynamic range display like we have for missile on the radar