cuz the AFV hull is easiest n cheapest to show-off these designs (already cut hole in the hull for turret, just needs adapter ring)
1 Like
Least that hot garbage is being used for something
aint no way the buccaneer is the only jet series that gets automatic fire suppressor right?
does anyone know why the ajax takes so long to accelerate?
iirc, there is something wrong with the gear ratios or its lacking gears or something
Should have duplicated gears from torque converter
Devs refuse to duplicate said gears until i find the gear ratios of the transmission
RENK does not share gear ratios with plebians such as myself, and there is no information on them at all
Yes I’m annoyed
7 Likes
Every Ajax is apparently being built differently lol. Due to a huge lack in build quality the whole things a flop.
I even wonder if there is continuity in the gearboxes.
Who made the powertrain for AJAX?
There’s nothing technical about British Politics
At last, a 8.3 SPAA. Not like we have any of those at the minute.
(Also I swear I’m losing my mind at no BR changes)
RR MTU 8V 199 TE21 engine
Renk HSWL 256B Transmission
Components are mix or RR MTU and Renk, whole thing might just be from GD from parts
1 Like
That quality control of the chassis not the transmission etc
I think it would be more like 7.7 tbh
20mms are pretty weak
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/OEYegLhSFXVU
Conway’s Gear ratios and speed wrong
Gives it an extra reverse gear which will help it tons reversing on inclines, and is 0.5mph faster in reverse
Used the Bug reporting manager’s own sources from my previous report
3 Likes
I mean, unless it was trialled on one of the outer wing pylons i dont see this helping us much sadly.
The only real use case would be for Jaguar GR.3. It would mean the Paveway 3 (2000lb) carriage being restricted to the centreline on the upgraded Jag, didn’t mean it had to have a separate aircraft carrying TIALD to designate.
2 Likes
Was Aim-9m ever seen on it?
I’ll take this over here.
First things first.
CAMM should be a lot better. Period. Maybe if/when ASRAAM is added, they might fix it.
But also CAMM and ASRAAM are not identical like say IRIS-T and IRIS-T SLS are.
There are docs/sources for ASRAAM that cant be used for CAMM unfortunately due to the differences, like CAMM is capped at Mach 3, but flame has sources for ASRAAM to be more like Mach 5.
So ASRAAM and CAMM should be fundementally different and ASRAAM will likely be better due to better availablility of some sources. Though hopefully CAMM will also improve in the future, its dreadful current
My understanding isn’t that CAMM is capped and ASRAAM is uncapped, but rather CAMM and ASRAAM BOTH have a topspeed of Mach 3 at sea-level/near sea level, so I wouldn’t take the CAMM’s topspeed in-game of Mach 3 to mean anything.
If anything, it just confirms that the ASRAAM will have Mach 5 topspeed at high altitude likely.
As I said earlier, the in-game topspeed is due to surface launched, nothing to do with CAMM’s fundamental design which in the end has the same body and fins as the ASRAAM as I understand it.
There are some documents in the National Archives about ASRAAM, so hopefully they can be used to report it. As you know though whether Gaijin will do anything with those reports is another matter. Hell, they still haven’t fixed the vast majority of the problems reported with CAMM on the first dev server (and I know Aster etc. are also doing bad in that regard).
CAMM in game has is programmed with a hard speed cap of Mach 3, meaning that if you just take CAMM and make it air launched the missile will not be able to exceed Mach 3 even when it should be able to easily. I don’t know if the guy in your video removed that limit or just ported CAMM over 1 to 1. If he just ported it over 1 to 1 then CAMM also has some time to gain stuff going on, which is potentially neutering it’s short range performance compared to what ASRAAM should be.
The max speed of CAMM is hard locked to Mach 3 (well strictly speaking 1028 m/s - the equivalent of Mach 3 at sea level) in game. If CAMM can accelerate to Mach 3 from stationary at sea level ASRAAM can likely accelerate to speeds of at least around Mach 4 when fired from around Mach 1 at Sea Level.
3 Likes