Your ascertain is the behaviour is wrong without stating with some materials why its wrong. You have to prove why said behaviour is wrong
1 Like
So does that mean I need primary docs to confirm that this shouldnt be happening?
No that’s an instructor issue, if it isn’t replicated with FRC then it doesn’t need a source material.
1 Like
You’ll be surprised what you can find with a trip to the National Archives
18 Likes
1 Like
Man the National Archives has a bunch of crazy stuff nobody really knows exists due to the lack of it being well… used at all I guess lol.
Meteor getting fitted in F-35
6 Likes
AJAX confirmed :)
4 Likes
isnt this the cannon only variant by which i mean the one that definitely cannot mount a javelin?
From that picture, yes
I’m not that bothered as IR guided ATGMs barely work ingame and just hugely raise vehicles BRs
We can get the AJAX IFV with javelins later, I get why people want them ingame on this AJAX tho they are cool
1 Like
can we use this thread to defend the L85a2 now then? because its a good rifle only the a1 sucked
2 Likes
going off the Badger which is at 9.0 then we can guess the AJAX is gonna be like 9.0-10.0 range and we already know the ammo sucks for this gun. With missile it could at least defend its self
This thing will be 10.3 minimum imo. Should be somewhat equivalent to Strf9040s at a similar BR
so dead on arrival
10.0-10.3 as its a british peer to the CV9040 (the vehicle we should have bought instead) but it has a much better power to weight ratio meaning it probs would be highrr
1 Like
Do hope they will add the BlackJack version with ironfist and Javelin in January. But Im mostly hyped for Prince of Wales.
Just a shame they went with PoW, given its the only one of the 5 that didnt get late war upgrades
Note it’s MIPS not ironfist itself, slightly different.
1 Like
Yeah aint happening. If you look at gajin release schedules.
Not to mention it being mock up
But we all know why, Gaijin just loves making the modernised fits expensive premiums.