British Weapon Systems - Technical data and discussion

No, you will go through the masts instead of aiming for the water line.

1 Like

This is likely why they are so bad at accuracy vs tanks too I bet, unlike every other system.

Pretty sure it’s just the low G loading, heavy missile and it’s powered for the whole flight. So targets with any angular velocity can result in a near miss.

It misses in the test room vs completely motionless vehicles too though xD

Krill issue haha

Really wish we could actually use the man in the loop stuffs. Missile feels really meh without that, in my personal opinion.

Protip, salvo the spawn from 30km in a spread and watch the SPAA’s pop as you land to rearm. Don’t even need a track, point targets for spawn camping SPAA is enough.

Oh yea, not saying they don’t work. They just feel meh. Kind of just more of the same instead of being interesting.

thats probably the only thing stopping it from being usless. its ability to find targets on the way. I still think the lock range of tanks should be further due to the fact it is meant to be man in the loop. 10km would be alot better than the 5-6km we have now.

You end up in top tier SPAA killing territory there so I can understand why tracking isn’t as far out as that, otherwise it would be quite abit higher in BR.

Looks like the 30mm RARDEN APDS is getting a rework

Do you guys think this will be a nerf or a buff? I would assume nerf as the Fox is staying at 7.7

1 Like

There is a 0% chance it’s a buff. I am expecting a nerf in either damage or pen or both.

5 Likes

As long as the pen is still over 95mm then it should be fine, really sucks though, stuff like the Warrior really didn’t need a nerf

The damage is already not great so i hope not. The thing really doesnt need a nerf rn.

Dont know if its just a Canberra exclusive but lately i havent been able to re arm on the af in ground rb. Specifically the 2 4000lbs bomb loadout. anyone else dealing with this as well?

How come the stormer AD has a blazer turret like the LAV-AD but doesn’t share the same traverse rate?

Given that Fox wasn’t moved at all but instead RARDEN is getting changed.

I suspect that Gaijin wants to nerf (“Recalculate”) RARDEN and see how it performs before the Fox is moved in BR.

I saw somewhere people believe that RARDEN was originally calculated by including the SABOT petals in the weight. And doing a quick google search, finding this on the old forums…

Imgur

But also this…

image

Forum Post for image reference in case the CONFIDENTIAL scares you

Guess we’ll have to wait and see.

So is it under performing or over performing. and does it even matter as gaijin use a formula so will all this even matter?

At this point, who knows.

It may not be mass either it may be caliber they’re recalculating. If it ends up worse than the crappy 2A72 APDS it’ll be ridiculous. It’s fine where it is, I’d prefer Fox to go higher in BR than the gun to get even more weakened.