So seems like they’re roughly the same in length, but L27 is far thicker?
Accounting for that missing tail plug, i’d say L27 and L29 are very closely matched in length, give or take 30mm of error.
Looks like L27 is far thicker and its tip is far less of a taper.
Don’t think they’re much thicker. It’s just the way the taper/ogive makes them look
This is L27 next to L29
Again, basically the same length as L29 and what we know about L28 compared to L27 and what we can see in that photo I posted before: the fin/tracer section extends right to the base of the tail plug
1 Like
L27 is 25mm thick for the DU penetrator
1 Like
This is really cool:
Meanwhile in WT: Ricochet.
7 Likes
Hmm
6 Likes
That is the greatest thing I have ever seen on the internet
Fin stabilised.
Vietnam? From what I recall the dual-mode capability was an urgent operational requirement to add man-in-the-loop capability to lower the risk of collateral damage in Afghanistan.
2 Likes
Yea Afghanistan. IDK what i did there, thanks for finding that.
2 Likes
One thing that I find very weird is that in game it has the same weight as L26, despite it being a presumably longer penetrator. Do you think Gaijin have got the dimensions wrong?
yes
length is right, its probably the weight that is wrong.
Both weights a dimensions are likely wrong in game. It seems like L26 is a 505x25.64, at 4.85kg at 1500/1600m/s.
L27 is probably closer to 625-640mm rather than the 600 it is in game. But is likely not 1650m/s.
Says who lol?
Just don’t really get how a bigger projectile can somehow weigh less, it’s an obvious performance loss in game.
Based on pictures of the training round no? but the weight of the penetrator should from what I’ve seen weight more. There is a 1.5kg difference in weigh (including the petals) between the L26 and L27.
That was proto L27 and so we can’t use it as a definitive value.
Yeah the training round is 660mm. How big the penetrator is is still technically up for debate.