British Weapon Systems - Technical data and discussion

thats air only

I’m looking for a more general list including ground and naval vehicles and weapons (i.e brimstone). Also Beaufighter mk 21 should have more ordinance.

I dont think there is a full list like that

Well this thread we’re in now is an air thread

That’s why I’m asking if anyone is making one. If not I can cobble something together.

I have a naval one: Britain Naval Tree - What’s left to be added for all BRs

But we could always just fuse them all together.

1 Like

I would be inclined to say that it is better to keep them separate. That way you can have more focused discussion and it is less work for a single person to maintain.

2 Likes

😅 i feel honoured

This is a really good collection of stuff. Every tree needs something like it. For now we need to create a bare bones version then expand it to be similar to yours.

1 Like

We have 1 for air, 1 for naval and 1 for helis. You could start a dedicated thread for ground (I have a baby one going for SPAA)

Right then. We can throw some stuff together to create the ground portion of the idea tree

Yep, though, when it comes to ground, my knowledge is far more limited. I know my planes quite well, and I know my boats. But not really my ground stuff.

I seriously cannot imagine any British ground vehicle being added that is as badly documented as Flakpanzer IV 3cm and Ostwind 2, we don’t know what they looked like, we’re not sure they were actually assembled and somehow it’s in the game.

Even our actually entered service ground vehicles have some weird game choices like A30 Avenger have inexplicably low traverse rates because Gaijin decided yes After Challenger with a 30 degree turret rotation speed the newer version of the vehicle (Avenger) has 14 degree (aced). Tetrarch same issue just fixed this patch because Jarms got hold of documentation showing what common sense should have showed Gaijin, we have footage of Daimlers turret traverse being very fast and it’s the same turret. Skink has plenty of documentation on it, used in combat, added with dodgy traverse. Still missing lots of wartime service vehicles, very sad.

Vickers Vampire and Vickers Vanguard tanks I guess are comparable ww2 tanks, prototypes we barely have any info on. Vanguard had 3 working versions built, Vampire not sure but possibly just a mockup.

1 Like

Yes I absolutely agree, @nathanclawfish has suggested a huge amount of the British content look through his topics if you want a good read

Yeah. Adding the Ostwind 2 but removing the Coelian was the stupidest thing Gaijin could’ve done. Same with the Panther II and the Tiger 10.5 but this isn’t the place to talk about them. With the Avenger though I don’t know anything about that. I mean from what I’ve heard the Avenger was with the artillery corps so it wouldn’t need to have a good traverse rate. Something I wouldn’t mind though is more wheeled South Africans. Concept 1 and 2 would be pretty funny with APDS and a LRF.
Because the Concept 3(P) went to Germany for some reason we can get the concept 3 with an Olifant turret
image

2 Likes

developed by germany quite an easy reason

Man I love my German developed Hawker Hunter
image

And my British developed T-90

9 Likes

Does anyone has the post they made saying the 9L/I was not currently planned?

they will come soonish either way, at the very least in 2 updates when they wanna add amraams, they have to give the f4f ice at the very least Aim 9L(I), it is already as shit as it is, and else the german community gonna go on yet another rampage

Does anyone have a link to the post about everything domestic that could replace SA? I had someone tell me SA was needed and the UK had nothing for those roles.