Not a clue, though I hazard a guess it was probably that the M113 ADATS is a production vehicle.
6 Likes
Was a static display, It’s an early low profile warrior hull which still retains the 6th roadwheel, while yeah the turret was funtional it wasn’t intergrated into the hull at all. Was a “quick” mock up for expos rather than a functional unit. This combination never saw trials as Starstreak was seen as a much more effective system. Literally the only pictures we have of the system are from the September 1988 copy of the International Defence Review, and it never saw trials (as a combined unit). Compare that to the M113, which reached serial production, and I think you can hazard a guess as to why.
1 Like
I’ll say something on this Warrior ADATS VS CAN ADATS. the Warrior one would be cool to add as a new vehicle but should only ever be used to replace the CAN one if there is a better place for it. Like a newly added tech tree that either Commonwealth or independent Canada only then should it be used to replace the M113 ADATS because unlike most of the removed vehicles, the CAN ADATS was built and used in numbers.
Unofficial website.
Never before seen Vickers Defence Systems design documents and exact specifications for Vickers Mk.11
The official VDS report
It’s legit, I promise :P
10 Likes
How much pen on that gun
Still not enough to pen soviet ERA unfortunately
1 Like
The Starstreak is still bugged to shit
7 Likes
At this point it feels like the devs can’t fix it, instead they should add the marlet missile as a researchable for the Stormer HVM
3 Likes
I mean it was fine 2 Updates ago, but now it started just phasing through enemies
@Gunjob sorry to bother you, are the devs already aware of the star streak issue?
(In the test drive they work perfectly fine but once you are in a match they don’t have a hit box anymore)
From what we know they know, and they are working on it.
Does anybody know if the Jaguar Gr.1 can get a better RWR than the 18223? I know the Gr.3 had a massive upgrade but if there was an upgrade similar to the 18228 before hand it would be nice to know.
I’ve obtained a new report. It seems that the RAF had significantly under-estimated the maximum range of Skyflash SuperTEMP when it entered service:
14 Likes
Imagine what the US was like with the AIM-7F.
Is this info enough for Gaijin to do anything? Or will the Skyflash Super Temp stay like it is now?
I’ve already reported the battery duration and will be doing a report for seeker range against larger targets. There may also be room to improve the kinematics of the missile, but that will need some testing.
3 Likes
Problem is it conforms to the graphs that we have currently, unless you have data to disprove those then I don’t think kinematics will change.
