British Weapon Systems - Technical data and discussion

FAA didn’t they used 9L(i)s starting from 1988 they used 9Ms on the FRS1 and then the FA2

Tornado F3 can have 9L(i) but there is no point as it can also get 9M

Swapping the stock 9L to Li would help though i guess.

2 Likes

That would be good, but it would make more sense for just 2 9L’s and 2 supertemps

1 Like

Anyone know if the Desert Warrior could carry more than 4 missiles? The standard Warrior having the space for 8 Milans makes me wonder if it should be able to carry more TOWs, especially if you have to choose between 2A and 2B

I wouldn’t hold your breath until we get an answer back from the devs.

Maybe ask here :)

3 Likes

Thanks, looks like someone else has already brought it up, though they didn’t seem to get a reply (yet)

Is this ours?

Hunter F. Mk. 6: radar: AN/APG-30 → ARI 5820

https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/1d6jf3c/dev_server_datamine_2351112_236016_part_1/?rdt=62322&onetap_auto=true&one_tap=true

Radar gun sight on the F.6

As in the range finder thing or are we getting an actual radar gun sight?

It’s just whatever it got right now just a name change for all it’s worth though

1 Like

I’m aware this is the air thread, but something about my ZA-35 radar isn’t mathing

Spoiler

image

Also appears to be broken and is doing a right to left scan instead of a circular one, if someone could confirm that’d be great

Ur not the only one
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/vsJTbxEFcgcZ
But how tf did you got 438?

Mind if i drop your ss in the report?

Track something travelling anticlockwise, for some reason it adds it on to the scan area

sure go ahead

Spoiler

to-do-list-see-everything-cyanide-and-happiness

4 Likes

Welp, site gives me an error, so i will do it later when it will allow me

no worries

Could be worse, the search radar isn’t doing the typical spinny roundy thing. instead going left and right to 090

1 Like